Effects of nateglinide and glibenclamide on prothrombotic factors in naïve type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a 1-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Author: CiceroArrigo F G, D'AngeloAngela, DerosaGiuseppe, FerrariIlaria, FogariElena, GravinaAlessia, SalvadeoSibilla

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters and on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors of metformin plus nateglinide or glibenclamide in naïve type 2 diabetes patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 248 type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled and randomly...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0320

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Nateglinide vs. Glibenclamide for Type 2 Diabetes: A Comparison of Effects on Coagulation and Fibrinolysis

The management of type 2 diabetes, a chronic condition characterized by high blood sugar levels, is a complex and evolving field. This double-blind, randomized clinical trial compares the effects of two medications, nateglinide and glibenclamide, on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes. The researchers found that both medications improved glycemic control, but nateglinide was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c, a marker of long-term blood sugar control. Nateglinide also led to a significant reduction in certain prothrombotic factors, suggesting a potential benefit in reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications. The study emphasizes the importance of considering the impact of diabetes medications on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters, particularly in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease.

A Closer Look at Diabetes Medications: Unveiling Potential Cardiovascular Benefits

The study reveals a potential advantage of nateglinide over glibenclamide in managing type 2 diabetes. While both medications effectively improved glycemic control, nateglinide demonstrated a more significant reduction in HbA1c and certain prothrombotic factors, suggesting potential benefits in reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications. This research underscores the importance of considering the impact of diabetes medications on cardiovascular risk factors, guiding treatment decisions towards medications that may offer additional benefits in managing these risks.

Navigating the Diabetes Desert: Choosing the Right Medication for Cardiovascular Health

Imagine traversing a vast desert, where the journey is fraught with potential dangers. Similarly, managing type 2 diabetes requires careful navigation to minimize the risk of complications. This study provides valuable insights into the potential cardiovascular benefits of different diabetes medications, enabling us to choose therapies that not only manage blood sugar but also address cardiovascular risk factors. By thoughtfully selecting medications, we can optimize patient care and navigate the journey towards better health.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of considering the impact of diabetes medications on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters, particularly in patients at risk for cardiovascular disease. The findings suggest that nateglinide may offer additional benefits in managing cardiovascular risk factors compared to glibenclamide, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient needs and risks.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2007-12-26
  2. Date Revised 2019-06-06
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

18025765

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0320

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.