Long-term follow-up of replacement compared with internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures: results at ten years in a randomised study of 450 patients.

Author: AkessonK, CarlssonA, LeonardssonO, RogmarkC, SernboI

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a series of 450 patients over 70 years of age with displaced fractures of the femoral neck sustained between 1995 and 1997 treatment was randomised either to internal fixation or replacement. Depending on age and level of activity the latter was either a total hip replacement or a hemiarthroplast...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23036

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Choosing the Right Path: Evaluating Long-Term Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment

In the vast landscape of orthopedic surgery, managing displaced femoral neck fractures poses a significant challenge. This research explores the long-term outcomes of two distinct treatment approaches: replacement and internal fixation. The study, encompassing 450 patients over 70 years of age, followed participants for a decade, comparing the effectiveness of each treatment strategy. The results reveal a significantly higher failure rate for internal fixation compared to replacement. The study highlights the long-term reliability of primary replacement in managing displaced femoral neck fractures.

Long-Term Outcomes: A Decade of Insight into Femoral Neck Fracture Treatment

This research, like a seasoned traveler navigating a challenging terrain, provides valuable insights into the long-term outcomes of femoral neck fracture treatment. The study's decade-long follow-up reveals a significant difference in success rates between internal fixation and replacement, with the latter demonstrating superior long-term results. This finding underscores the importance of carefully considering the long-term implications of treatment choices in managing these complex fractures.

Managing Femoral Neck Fractures: A Collaborative Journey

Navigating the complexities of femoral neck fractures requires a collaborative effort between patients, surgeons, and healthcare professionals. This research emphasizes the importance of making informed decisions based on individual patient needs and the long-term implications of treatment choices. While primary replacement offers promising long-term results, it's crucial to consult with a healthcare professional for personalized guidance and a comprehensive approach to fracture management.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research, like a compass guiding us through the intricate landscape of femoral neck fracture management, underscores the importance of long-term considerations in treatment choices. The study demonstrates the enduring benefits of primary replacement, providing valuable insights for both surgeons and patients. As we navigate the complexities of orthopedic surgery, it's essential to embrace a collaborative approach that prioritizes patient well-being and long-term success.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2010-03-26
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

20190313

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.23036

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.