Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase IV comparative trial of a suffocant compared with malathion in the treatment of head lice in children.

Author: BarnesTanya M, GreiveKerryn A, LuiAda H, OppenheimV M Jane

Clinical Trial, Phase IVPost-marketing surveillance. Monitors long-term safety/efficacy after approval.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

A suffocant-based head lice treatment was significantly more effective than malathion in eliminating head lice in children, with a low incidence of mild and transient adverse events.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: There are concerns about the effectiveness of head lice treatments because of increasing resistance and safety. This trial compared the safety and efficacy of a suffocant-based head lice treatment to malathion in children. METHODS: The trial used strict entry criteria, standa...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-0960.2010.00622.x

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Suffocant vs. Malathion for Head Lice: A Comparative Study

The quest for effective and safe treatments for head lice is like searching for an oasis in a desert plagued by pesky insects. This research compares the effectiveness of a suffocant-based head lice treatment to malathion, a common insecticide, in children. The study, conducted in a parallel-group design, found that the suffocant was significantly more effective than malathion in eliminating head lice and was associated with fewer adverse events.

A Safer and More Effective Oasis

This study offers a promising solution for those struggling with head lice infestations, highlighting the potential of suffocant-based treatments as a safer and more effective alternative to traditional insecticides.

Navigating the Head Lice Desert

The journey through head lice infestations can be both frustrating and uncomfortable. This research provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of various treatment options, offering a guide for choosing the most effective and safest solution.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research compares the efficacy of a suffocant-based head lice treatment to malathion. The study suggests that the suffocant is a more effective and safer option for eliminating head lice in children. It highlights the importance of choosing treatments that are both effective and safe for those struggling with head lice infestations.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2010-11-30
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

20695855

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/j.1440-0960.2010.00622.x

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of head lice
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.