Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Clinical efficacy and safety of etanercept versus sulfasalazine in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized, double-blind trial.
Author: BraunJuergen, Burgos-VargasRuben, FreundlichBruce, HuangFeng, KoenigAndrew S, VlahosBonnie, van der Horst-BruinsmaIrene E
Original Abstract of the Article :
Etanercept, a fully human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor, is an effective treatment in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Sulfasalazine is frequently used for the treatment of both axial symptoms and peripheral symptoms of AS, and it has been the recommended therapy before the use of a...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30223
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Etanercept vs. Sulfasalazine: A Showdown in the Desert of Ankylosing Spondylitis
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS), a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine, can be a relentless desert storm, causing pain and stiffness that can make even the simplest movements feel like an arduous journey. Two medications, etanercept and sulfasalazine, are commonly used to manage this condition, but their relative efficacy and safety have been the subject of much debate, much like a desert oasis disputed by rival tribes. This study, a beacon of light in the desert of AS research, aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of etanercept and sulfasalazine in patients with axial and peripheral manifestations of AS. The researchers carefully designed a randomized, double-blind trial, meticulously tracking the progress of patients receiving either etanercept or sulfasalazine for 16 weeks.
The Oasis of Etanercept: A More Effective Treatment?
This study, like a carefully planned caravan route across the desert, provided valuable insights into the effectiveness of etanercept and sulfasalazine for AS. The results suggest that etanercept may be a more effective treatment than sulfasalazine for both axial and peripheral manifestations of AS. However, it's important to note that this study was relatively short-term and further research is needed to determine the long-term outcomes of each treatment.
Navigating the Desert of Ankylosing Spondylitis: Choosing the Right Oasis
This research highlights the potential benefits of etanercept for individuals with AS. However, it's crucial to remember that every individual's journey through the desert of AS is unique. The best treatment option depends on the severity of the symptoms, individual factors, and potential side effects. Consult with a qualified healthcare provider to discuss your specific situation and create a personalized treatment plan that best meets your needs.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This research sheds light on the potential of etanercept as a treatment for AS, offering a potential oasis of relief for those seeking a more effective treatment option. While more research is necessary to fully understand its long-term efficacy and potential side effects, the findings suggest that etanercept may be a valuable tool for managing the symptoms of AS. The journey through the desert of AS is challenging, but with the right guidance and treatment, we can find a path towards a better quality of life.
Date :
- Date Completed 2011-08-17
- Date Revised 2022-03-21
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.