Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Original Abstract of the Article :
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the centerpiece of evidence-based medicine. However, because of the limited follow-up, additional evidence on the long-term consequences of the outcomes used in trials is commonly required for clinical and policy decision making. This article provides insights...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2011.61
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
The Long-Term Impact of Nonfatal Events in Clinical Trials: A Case Study of Prasugrel
This research explores the importance of considering the long-term consequences of nonfatal events in clinical trials, using prasugrel, a drug used to prevent blood clots, as a case study. The researchers highlight the limitations of relying solely on short-term data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to make informed clinical and policy decisions. The study emphasizes the need for additional evidence on the long-term impact of nonfatal events, such as myocardial infarction or bleeding, to provide a more complete picture of the drug's effects.Beyond Short-Term Outcomes: Unveiling the Long-Term Impact
This research underscores the limitations of focusing solely on short-term outcomes in clinical trials. The authors argue that long-term data on the consequences of nonfatal events, such as myocardial infarction or bleeding, are critical to inform clinical and policy decisions about drug efficacy and safety. This research serves as a reminder that the long-term picture may differ significantly from the short-term view presented in traditional clinical trials.Long-Term Considerations: Making Informed Decisions
This research emphasizes the importance of considering the long-term impact of medical interventions when making clinical and policy decisions. It is crucial to gather evidence beyond the short-term outcomes reported in traditional clinical trials to provide a more complete understanding of the potential benefits and risks of a treatment.Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This research is a valuable reminder that the desert of scientific knowledge is vast and multifaceted. The study underscores the importance of looking beyond the immediate horizon of short-term data and considering the long-term consequences of medical interventions. It's like peering through a telescope to see not only the immediate stars but also the galaxies beyond.Date :
- Date Completed 2011-08-23
- Date Revised 2015-11-19
Further Info :
Related Literature
Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages
English
Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.