Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Comparative studies on the usefulness of phosphate versus glycerin enema in preparation for colon examinations.
Author: AokiT, ArigaH, KanedaN, KawamuraF, MatsuoY, MotokiY, RyohH, SugimuraF, WatanabeT, YonemitsuK
Original Abstract of the Article :
Fifty of 100 persons who had undergone health screening received phosphate enema while the other 50 received glycerin enema prior to proctoscopy and barium enema, and their usefulness for preparation for colon examination was compared by a double-blind test. There was no significant difference in th...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02779332
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Enema Preparation: A Tale of Two Methods
The world of [colon examinations] is a bit like a desert – sometimes it's smooth sailing, and sometimes it's a bumpy ride. This study compares the effectiveness of [phosphate enema] and [glycerin enema] in preparing patients for colon examinations. The researchers conducted a [double-blind study] involving 100 individuals and found that both enemas achieved similar levels of colonic cleansing. However, there were some interesting differences in terms of side effects. [Phosphate enema] was associated with less abdominal pain but a delayed effect on defecation, while [glycerin enema] produced more irritation but a faster effect. It's a bit like choosing between two paths in the desert – both can lead to the destination, but one might be a bit more comfortable than the other.
Choosing the Right Path
This study provides valuable information for healthcare professionals when choosing between [phosphate enema] and [glycerin enema] for colon examination preparation. It's like navigating a desert – you need to consider the advantages and disadvantages of each route and choose the one that best suits your needs. The findings suggest that [phosphate enema] might be a better option for patients who are concerned about abdominal pain, while [glycerin enema] might be a better choice for patients who need a faster-acting preparation. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on the individual patient's needs and preferences.
A Note of Caution
The study also highlights the importance of considering the potential risks of both enemas. It's like traveling in the desert – you need to be aware of the potential dangers and take precautions to avoid them. While both enemas are generally safe, there is a risk of [rectal irritation], especially with [phosphate enema]. Healthcare providers should discuss the potential risks and benefits of each enema with patients to ensure that they make informed decisions about their care.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This study reminds me of the desert – a place where even the simplest tasks can be fraught with challenges. The researchers have carefully compared two common enema preparations and found that they both have their advantages and disadvantages. It's a reminder that there's no one-size-fits-all approach to medical care and that careful consideration should be given to the individual patient's needs and preferences. Just as a desert explorer chooses the best path for their journey, healthcare professionals should choose the best enema preparation for each patient.
Date :
- Date Completed 1990-11-19
- Date Revised 2019-09-12
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.