Platelet activation markers after conversion from azathioprine to sirolimus based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients.

Author: GossmannJan, GraffJochen, HarderSebastian, ReicheClaudia, ScheuermannErnst-Heinrich

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: Under immunosupression with sirolimus (rapamycin) procoagulant effects and platelet activation have been controversially discussed. METHODS: We evaluated patients of a prospectly designed substudy as part of a randomized trial investigating the effect of a switch from non-mTOR-based immu...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.5414/CP201768

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Platelet Activation and Sirolimus-Based Immunosuppression

This study delves into the potential effects of sirolimus-based immunosuppression on platelet activation in renal transplant recipients. The researchers conducted a prospective substudy to assess platelet activation markers after switching from azathioprine-based immunosuppression to sirolimus in a cohort of renal transplant recipients.

No Evidence for Increased Platelet Activation

The study compared a group of patients who switched from azathioprine to sirolimus with a control group who remained on azathioprine. They evaluated various markers of platelet activation, degranulation, aggregation, and monocyte activation. The study found no evidence for increased platelet activation parameters in the sirolimus conversion group compared to the control group.

Implications for Renal Transplant Management

This research provides valuable insights into the safety profile of sirolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients, suggesting that it does not appear to significantly increase platelet activation. It reinforces the importance of ongoing monitoring of platelet function in these patients, especially those transitioning to sirolimus therapy. This study provides valuable data for informing clinical decision-making and ensuring optimal patient care.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study is like a cool oasis in a desert of concerns about sirolimus-based immunosuppression. It provides reassurance that switching to sirolimus doesn't seem to cause a spike in platelet activation. This study serves as a reminder that careful observation and research are essential to understand the nuances of medical treatments, especially those involving complex therapies like immunosuppression. It's good to know that with research, we can find ways to manage the desert-like challenges of organ transplantation.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-04-23
  2. Date Revised 2017-11-16
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23006444

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.5414/CP201768

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.