Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Oral chloral hydrate vs. intranasal midazolam for sedation during computerized tomography.

Author: BehdadShekofah, FallahRazieh, MoghaddamReza Nafisi, NakhaeiMohammad Hosein Ataee, ShamszadehAli

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This study compared the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam for sedation in children undergoing computerized tomography (CT) scan of the brain. Oral chloral hydrate was found to be more effective and safe for sedation than intranasal midazolam.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
We conducted this single blind randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam for induction of sedation for computerized tomography scan of brain in children. Participants aged 1-10 years (n=60) were randomized to receive 100 mg/kg chlor...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-013-0065-5

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Calming Young Minds: A Comparison of Sedatives for CT Scans

The world of pediatric medicine is often a delicate dance, demanding a careful touch and understanding. This study, like a seasoned desert guide leading a caravan of children, explores the effectiveness of two sedatives for brain CT scans in young patients. It compares oral chloral hydrate and intranasal midazolam, aiming to identify the safest and most effective option for calming anxious children. The authors found that oral chloral hydrate emerged as the more reliable choice, successfully inducing sedation and allowing for the completion of the CT scan in a significantly higher proportion of patients.

Oral Chloral Hydrate: A Reliable Choice for Pediatric Sedation

The study demonstrates that oral chloral hydrate is a safe and effective option for sedation in children undergoing brain CT scans, with a significantly higher success rate compared to intranasal midazolam. This finding is important because it provides doctors with a valuable tool for ensuring that young patients remain calm and comfortable during these essential medical procedures.

Comforting Children During Medical Procedures

This research offers reassurance for parents and caregivers seeking safe and effective sedation options for their children. It highlights the importance of considering the specific needs and preferences of each patient, working with a healthcare professional to determine the best approach. Remember, just as a wise desert traveler prepares for a journey with the right tools and knowledge, ensuring a comfortable experience for children during medical procedures requires careful planning and consideration.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a gentle desert breeze, brings a sense of calm to the process of pediatric sedation. It offers valuable insights into the efficacy of oral chloral hydrate, providing a reliable option for ensuring a smooth and comfortable experience for young patients during brain CT scans.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2014-01-21
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23024102

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s13312-013-0065-5

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of chloral hydrate
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.