Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A randomized, single-center study of equivalence of 2 intraocular lenses used in cataract surgery.

Author: BoffaUmberto, ConstantinouMarios, JhanjiVishal, JingXie, LamoureuxEcosse L, TaylorHugh R, VajpayeeRasik B

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

The Tecsoft Flex IOL is a safe and effective low-cost alternative to the AcrySof IOL in the treatment of age-related cataracts.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of 2 intraocular lenses (IOLs) for the treatment of age-related cataracts. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with age-related cataracts were recruited and randomized to receive phacoemulsification and implantation of either the AcrySof S...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.035

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Intraocular Lenses: Finding the Right Lens for Cataract Surgery

Cataract surgery, a common procedure to restore vision, is like a delicate desert surgery, requiring precision and skill. This research compares the outcomes of two different intraocular lenses (IOLs), the AcrySof SA60AT and the Tecsoft Flex, in patients undergoing cataract surgery. It’s like exploring different pathways through a desert landscape, seeking the most effective and safe approach for restoring vision.

Two Lenses, One Goal: Finding the Right Fit

The study demonstrates that both IOLs, the AcrySof SA60AT and the Tecsoft Flex, are effective in restoring vision after cataract surgery. It's like finding two different oases in the desert, each offering similar resources and benefits. The researchers found no significant difference in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) rates between the two groups. This research suggests that the Tecsoft Flex lens, a lower-cost option, may be a suitable alternative to the AcrySof SA60AT.

Cataract Surgery: Choosing the Right Path to Vision Restoration

This research highlights the importance of considering different IOL options when making treatment decisions for cataract surgery. It's like selecting the right camel for a desert journey, ensuring a smooth and successful trek. The study encourages patients to discuss their individual needs and preferences with their healthcare providers to determine the best IOL option for their specific situation.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is a valuable resource for patients considering cataract surgery. It offers insights into different IOL options and their potential benefits, providing a framework for making informed treatment decisions. It's a reminder that the field of ophthalmology is constantly evolving, with new technologies and approaches emerging to improve vision and quality of life for patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-08-01
  2. Date Revised 2018-04-17
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23207175

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.035

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of cataract
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.