Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of first-generation antipsychotics (FGA) prescribed for treatment of psychiatric and neurological conditions and use of benztropine to reduce extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) by patient race/ethnicity in a nationally representative sample of adul...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3819

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Racial Disparities in Antipsychotic Prescription: A Camel's Perspective on Mental Health

The desert of mental health care is vast and complex, with many hidden disparities waiting to be addressed. This study delves into the troubling issue of racial disparities in the prescription of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) for psychiatric and neurological conditions. The researchers analyzed a nationally representative sample of outpatient visits, focusing on the prevalence of FGA prescriptions and the use of benztropine, a medication used to manage extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) associated with FGAs. Their findings reveal a persistent pattern of racial disparities in the prescription of FGAs, highlighting the need for systemic changes to ensure equitable access to mental health care.

Racial Disparities in Antipsychotic Prescription: A Desert of Inequality

The study's findings, like a stark desert landscape, reveal the persistent presence of racial disparities in the prescription of FGAs. This discovery is a stark reminder that the desert of mental health care is not a level playing field, with certain groups facing significant barriers to equitable access to treatment. The researchers highlight the importance of addressing these disparities through increased awareness, improved training for clinicians, and systemic changes to ensure culturally sensitive and equitable care.

Towards Equity in Mental Health Care: A Camel's Perspective

Mental health care should be accessible and equitable for all. This study underscores the urgent need to address the persistent racial disparities in the prescription of antipsychotic medications. The findings highlight the importance of ensuring that all individuals have equal access to culturally sensitive and effective mental health care. This is a reminder that the desert of mental health care is vast and complex, but with collective effort, we can create a more equitable and compassionate landscape for all.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study examines the persistent racial disparities in the prescription of first-generation antipsychotics, highlighting the need for systemic changes to ensure equitable access to mental health care. The findings inspire action and call for a more equitable and compassionate approach to mental health care for all individuals.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-08-29
  2. Date Revised 2022-12-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

26132170

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1002/pds.3819

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.