Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Patient-Provider Communication About Prostate Cancer Screening and Treatment: New Evidence From the Health Information National Trends Survey.
Author: BhuyanSoumitra S, ChandakAastha, GentryDan, GuptaNiodita, IsharwalSudhir, LaGrangeChad, MahmoodAsos
Original Abstract of the Article :
The American Urological Association, American Cancer Society, and American College of Physicians recommend that patients and providers make a shared decision with respect to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer (PCa). The goal of this study is to determine the extent of patien...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5675184/
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
The Importance of Patient-Provider Communication in Prostate Cancer Screening
The field of prostate cancer research is striving to improve communication between doctors and patients about crucial decisions related to screening and treatment. This study, using data from the Health Information National Trends Survey, aims to understand how much communication takes place between patients and providers about PSA testing and prostate cancer treatment. The researchers employed a rigorous methodology to analyze patient characteristics and their connection to four key communication areas: expert opinion on PSA tests, the accuracy of PSA tests, potential side effects of prostate cancer treatment, and the necessity of treatment.
The findings revealed a worrying trend: a low level of communication about all four domains, with less than 10% of respondents reporting communication about all aspects. This lack of open communication presents a significant obstacle to achieving shared decision-making, which is currently the recommended best practice for prostate cancer screening and treatment.
Communication Barriers and Their Impact
The research highlights the crucial role of patient characteristics in facilitating communication. Factors such as recent medical checkups, a regular healthcare provider, overall health status, age group, marital status, race, household income, and prior PSA testing experience were found to be associated with improved communication. This suggests that patients with a history of engaging with the healthcare system, or those who are more proactive about their health, are more likely to discuss these important issues with their doctors.
Bridging the Communication Gap: Empowering Patients
The study underscores the critical need to improve patient-provider communication for effective prostate cancer management. These findings serve as a powerful call to action for physicians to prioritize open communication and facilitate informed decision-making. It is essential for patients to actively participate in conversations about their health, ask questions, and express their concerns. This approach can help build trust and improve the overall quality of care. This is like traversing a vast desert - you need a map, a guide, and a strong camel to navigate the terrain. In this case, patients are the camels, doctors are the guides, and open communication is the map, leading to successful journeys through the challenges of prostate cancer.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This research underscores the vital need for open communication between patients and doctors, especially regarding crucial topics like prostate cancer screening and treatment. It's important to remember that patients play an active role in their healthcare journey and should be empowered to ask questions and voice their concerns. By fostering open communication, we can navigate the vast and sometimes confusing landscape of prostate cancer with more confidence and clarity.
Date :
- Date Completed n.d.
- Date Revised 2019-11-20
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.