Effects of nateglinide and rosiglitazone on pancreatic alpha- and beta-cells, GLP-1 secretion and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes: randomized crossover clinical study.

Author: CorreiaMárcia Regina Silva, CunhaMaria Rosário, Dos SantosRosa Ferreira, FukuiRosa Tsumeshiro, RochaDalva Marreiro, TostesGlauce Cordeiro Ulhôa, da SilvaMaria Elizabeth Rossi

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: To compare the effects of nateglinide and rosiglitazone on inflammatory markers, GLP-1 levels and metabolic profile in patients with type 2 diabetes (DM2). METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 20 patients with DM2, mean age 51.82 ± 8.05 years, previously treated with dietary in...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700605/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Nateglinide vs. Rosiglitazone: A Camel Race in the Desert of Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disorder that affects millions worldwide, resembling a vast desert of challenges for patients and researchers alike. This study, like a thrilling camel race, compares the effects of two common antidiabetic drugs, nateglinide and rosiglitazone, on various metabolic and inflammatory markers in T2DM patients. The study enrolled 20 patients, each receiving 4 months of treatment with either nateglinide or rosiglitazone, followed by a washout period and a cross-over to the alternative treatment. The researchers meticulously measured a wide array of variables, including blood glucose levels, insulin secretion, inflammatory markers, and lipid profiles. The results revealed that both drugs effectively improved glucose and lipid profiles, showcasing the potential of each to navigate the desert of T2DM. However, rosiglitazone emerged as the more potent champion in combatting inflammation, highlighting the importance of tailored treatment approaches in this complex disease.

Navigating the Desert with Precision: Rosiglitazone Shows Promise

Rosiglitazone's ability to decrease inflammatory markers like CRP, fibrinogen, and TGFβ offers a significant advantage over nateglinide. These findings emphasize the importance of addressing not just blood sugar but also the underlying inflammatory processes that contribute to T2DM's long-term complications. This research provides valuable insights into the multifaceted nature of T2DM and underscores the need for personalized treatment approaches that address both metabolic and inflammatory aspects of the disease.

A Journey Through the Desert of T2DM: Healthy Choices and Careful Monitoring

The desert of T2DM requires constant vigilance and a commitment to healthy choices. While these medications can help control blood sugar and inflammation, it's essential to remember that they are only part of the journey. Maintaining a balanced diet, regular exercise, and close monitoring of blood sugar levels are crucial for maintaining long-term health and managing the complexities of this chronic condition.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the multifaceted landscape of T2DM. Rosiglitazone's ability to effectively manage both metabolic and inflammatory aspects of the disease offers a promising approach for managing this chronic condition. However, the desert of T2DM demands a holistic approach, combining medication with lifestyle modifications and careful monitoring to achieve long-term health.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2016-01-06
  2. Date Revised 2020-10-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

26734075

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC4700605

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.