Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation in the Treatment of Respiratory Failure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Author: AsheTerrell, BublewiczMichael, DennisRose, DoshiPratik, DunlapCharles, EllisTerry W, GordonNancy, GrahamRussell, GranadoMisha, HillMandy, KearneyJoseph, MaynardDianna, MillerThomas L, SalazarSuesann, SpiveySheldon, TillotsonApril, WhittleJessica S

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

This study compares high-velocity nasal insufflation, a form of high-flow nasal cannula, with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of undifferentiated respiratory failure, assessing therapy failure as indicated by the need for intubation or crossover to the alternative therapy.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
We compare high-velocity nasal insufflation, a form of high-flow nasal cannula, with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the treatment of undifferentiated respiratory failure with respect to therapy failure, as indicated by requirement for endotracheal intubation or cross over to the altern...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.006

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation for Respiratory Failure: Exploring a New Oasis in Respiratory Care

This randomized clinical trial compares the effectiveness of high-velocity nasal insufflation, a form of high-flow nasal cannula, with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) in the treatment of undifferentiated respiratory failure. The authors investigate the ability of these two approaches to prevent the need for endotracheal intubation or a switch to alternative therapies. It's like exploring two different oases in the desert of respiratory care, seeking the most effective and efficient means of supporting patients with respiratory failure.

High-Velocity Nasal Insufflation: A Potential Alternative to NPPV

This study investigates the potential of high-velocity nasal insufflation as a viable alternative to NPPV in the management of respiratory failure. The authors aim to determine if this approach can effectively prevent the need for invasive ventilation, providing a less burdensome and more comfortable option for patients. It's like discovering a new oasis in the desert, offering a potentially more effective and less invasive path to recovery.

Respiratory Failure: Seeking the Optimal Treatment Approach

This research highlights the ongoing search for optimal treatment approaches for respiratory failure. The authors compare the effectiveness of two different noninvasive therapies, seeking to identify the most effective option for preventing the need for invasive ventilation. It's like searching for the best route through the desert of respiratory complications, ensuring the most successful and comfortable journey for patients.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research investigates the potential of high-velocity nasal insufflation as a promising alternative to NPPV in the management of respiratory failure. The study aims to compare the effectiveness of these two approaches in preventing the need for invasive ventilation, ultimately seeking to improve patient outcomes and enhance the comfort of respiratory care. It's like exploring a vast desert, seeking the most effective and efficient paths to recovery for those facing respiratory challenges.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-07-29
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29310868

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.12.006

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of respiratory failure
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.