Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In 2013, the Advisory Committee of the Food and Drug Administration determined hydrocodone combination medications (HCMs) needed tighter regulation due to high abuse potential; they recommended upscheduling HCMs from Schedule III to II. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of upschedu...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29878963

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Upscheduling Hydrocodone Combination Medications: Navigating a Shifting Landscape of Pain Management

This study dives into the complex and often contested landscape of pain management, focusing on the impact of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) upscheduling of hydrocodone combination medications (HCMs). The study examines the effects of this policy change on the practices of advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) in Oklahoma, exploring the ripple effects of this regulatory shift on pain management practices.

A Regulatory Shift in the Desert: The Upscheduling of Hydrocodone

This study reveals that the upscheduling of HCMs has had a noticeable impact on the practices of APRNs in Oklahoma. The study's findings suggest that APRNs have adapted their pain management practices in response to the regulatory changes, highlighting the need for ongoing communication and collaboration between healthcare providers and policymakers to ensure effective pain management practices.

Navigating the Changing Sands: The Impact on Pain Management

The research underscores the importance of considering the impact of regulatory changes on pain management practices. The study highlights the need for ongoing communication and collaboration between healthcare providers and policymakers to ensure that patients receive appropriate and effective pain management care. The study also reinforces the need for research into alternative pain management strategies to address the challenges posed by regulatory shifts.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides a glimpse into the shifting sands of pain management policy. The upscheduling of HCMs has created a new landscape, and healthcare providers are adapting their practices accordingly. While navigating these changes can be challenging, research and collaborative efforts can help to ensure that patients receive the best possible pain management care. This study underscores the importance of ongoing dialogue and research to ensure that pain management practices continue to meet the needs of patients in the ever-changing desert of healthcare.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-01-28
  2. Date Revised 2021-09-15
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

29878963

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

01741002-201806000-00004

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.