Review article: an analysis of safety profiles of treatments for diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Author: LacyBrian E

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is multifactorial in nature, and a wide range of therapies is available to manage symptoms of this common disorder. AIM: To provide an overview of the safety of interventions that may be used to manage patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). METH...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6667996/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): Navigating the Landscape of Treatment

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder that can significantly impact a person's quality of life. This study provides a comprehensive overview of the safety profiles of various treatments for diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). The authors, like desert explorers mapping a vast and complex terrain, analyzed a wide range of therapies, including dietary modifications, probiotics, medications, and complementary and alternative therapies, to assess their safety and efficacy.

A Guide to IBS-D Treatment: Weighing Safety and Efficacy

The study found that a variety of treatments are available for IBS-D, each with its own unique safety profile. The researchers analyzed the number needed to harm (NNH), a metric that measures the number of patients treated to encounter an adverse event. They found that antidepressants had the lowest NNH, while probiotics had the highest. This highlights the importance of carefully weighing the potential risks and benefits of each treatment option. It's crucial for healthcare providers to select the most appropriate therapy based on individual patient characteristics and preferences.

Finding the Right Oasis of Relief: Choosing Safe and Effective Treatments

The study emphasizes the need for a personalized approach to IBS-D treatment. Healthcare providers must consider both the safety and efficacy of each therapy when making treatment decisions. Just as a desert explorer chooses the most reliable source of water, patients should be informed about the potential risks and benefits of each treatment option to make informed decisions about their care. This research provides valuable guidance for navigating the landscape of IBS-D treatment, ensuring that patients receive safe and effective care.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers a thorough analysis of the safety profiles of IBS-D treatments. The desert of IBS-D treatments can be vast and complex, with each oasis offering unique benefits and risks. Healthcare providers must act as skilled explorers, carefully navigating this terrain to find the most appropriate and safe treatment for each individual patient. This research is crucial for ensuring that patients receive the best possible care and achieve lasting relief from their symptoms.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-09-09
  2. Date Revised 2023-10-13
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30194692

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC6667996

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.