Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of a new colon lavage solution (Golytely-RSS) with a standard preparation for air-contrast barium enema.

Author: DiPalmaJ A, ManganoF A, TomlinsonT L

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Golytely-RSS, a new formulation of Golytely, is an acceptable alternative to standard colon-cleansing methods for air-contrast barium enema. However, side effects were reported more frequently in the Golytely-RSS group.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Golytely is a balanced electrolyte solution for per oral whole-gut lavage. It has been an accepted alternative to standard preparations for barium enema. Golytely-RSS is a new formulation designed to taste better through reduction in sodium and sulfate content. In addition, a slight increase in osmo...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.151.5.947

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

A Colon Cleansing Comparison: Two Oases in the Desert of Preparation

Preparing for a medical procedure can be a daunting task, akin to navigating a vast and unfamiliar desert. This study compares two colon cleansing methods, a standard cathartic approach and a newer lavage solution called Golytely-RSS. The authors randomly assigned patients to one of these preparations and evaluated the effectiveness of each method in preparing them for an air-contrast barium enema. This research is like carefully comparing two paths through the desert, seeking the most effective route to reach our destination.

Finding the Right Path: Colon Cleansing Methods

The study found that both the standard method and Golytely-RSS were effective in cleansing the colon, with minimal differences in the amount of fecal material and mucosal coating. However, Golytely-RSS was associated with more unpleasant side effects and a higher rate of unwillingness to use the preparation again. This research highlights the importance of considering both effectiveness and tolerability when choosing a colon cleansing method, allowing us to navigate the desert of preparation with greater comfort.

A Healthier Desert: Colon Cleansing Considerations

Preparing for medical procedures can be a challenging but necessary part of the process. This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and tolerability of different colon cleansing methods, reminding us that the best option for each patient may vary depending on individual needs and preferences. By understanding these nuances, we can make the desert of preparation a little less harsh, promoting a more comfortable and effective experience for all.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The comparison of colon cleansing methods is a reminder that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to medical preparation. This research highlights the importance of considering both effectiveness and tolerability when choosing a method, allowing us to navigate the desert of preparation with greater comfort and ease. By remaining open to different options and considering individual needs, we can create a more pleasant and effective experience for all.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1988-11-10
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

3051962

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2214/ajr.151.5.947

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.