Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparative effectiveness of interventions for managing postoperative catheter-related bladder discomfort: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Author: BahkJae-Hyon, HurMin, KimJin-Tae, KimWon Ho, KuJa Hyeon, LeeHyung-Chul, ParkSun-Kyung, YooSeokha, YoonHyun-Kyu

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of various drugs and interventions used to manage catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) in patients undergoing urological surgery.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Although many drugs or interventions have been studied to manage catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD), their comparative effectiveness is unknown. We attempted to assess the comparative effectiveness of the strategies to manage CRBD in patients undergoing urologic surgery including amikacin, s...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2597-2

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Managing Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort: A Comprehensive Look at Interventions

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates the comparative effectiveness of various interventions for managing [catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD)] in patients undergoing [urologic surgery]. The study examines the effectiveness of a wide range of treatments, including [amikacin], [solifenacin], [darifenacin], [butylscopolamine], [dexmedetomidine], [gabapentin], [glycopyrrolate], [ketamine], [oxybutynin], [resiniferatoxin], [tolterodine], [tramadol], [caudal block], [dorsal penile nerve block], and [lidocaine-prilocaine cream].

A Comparative Analysis of Interventions for CRBD: Insights for Optimal Treatment

This meta-analysis provides a comprehensive comparison of the effectiveness of various interventions for managing [CRBD], offering valuable insights for clinicians seeking to optimize treatment strategies. The research highlights the importance of considering the individual needs of patients and the potential benefits and drawbacks of different treatment options.

Easing the Burden of CRBD: A Focus on Patient Comfort

This study emphasizes the importance of managing [catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD)] effectively, ensuring patient comfort and improving their overall experience during [urologic surgery]. Just as a camel relies on its strong legs to navigate the desert, patients undergoing [urologic surgery] require effective management of [CRBD] to minimize discomfort and optimize their recovery.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This systematic review and network meta-analysis provides a valuable roadmap for managing [catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD)], highlighting the importance of considering individual patient needs and the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options. The research underscores the ongoing need for research and innovation to develop more effective and personalized strategies for managing [CRBD] and improving patient care.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2020-04-06
  2. Date Revised 2020-07-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30603826

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s00540-018-2597-2

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effects of darifenacin
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.