Recurrent retinal vein thrombosis: prevention with Aspirin, Pycnogenol®, ticlopidine, or sulodexide.

Author: BelcaroGianni, BradfordHugh D, CesaroneMaria R, CotelleseRoberto, DugallMark, FeragalliBeatrice, GizziCorrado, HosoiMorio, HuShu, RodriguezPatrizia

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of Aspirin, Pycnogenol®, ticlopidine, and sulodexide to reduce the incidence of new RTV (retinal vein thrombosis) after a first episode. Pycnogenol® is an anti-inflammatory, anti-edema, mild antiplatelet-antithrombotic agent. METHODS: The reg...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.19.04891-6

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Preventing Recurrent Retinal Vein Thrombosis

This research ventures into the intricate landscape of ophthalmology, exploring strategies for preventing recurrent retinal vein thrombosis (RVT). The study investigates the efficacy of various treatments, including Aspirin, Pycnogenol, ticlopidine, and sulodexide, in reducing the incidence of new RVT episodes after a first event. The researchers analyzed a registry study involving 307 subjects, comparing the incidence of recurrent RVT in different treatment groups. The study found that Pycnogenol significantly reduced the incidence of recurrent RVT compared to standard management (SM) alone. Aspirin, ticlopidine, and sulodexide also demonstrated a reduction in recurrent RVT, albeit to a lesser extent. The study further highlights the effectiveness of Pycnogenol in controlling edema, a common complication associated with RVT. This research offers valuable insights into the potential benefits of various treatments in preventing recurrent RVT, providing guidance for ophthalmologists in managing this condition.

The Importance of Preventing Recurrent RVT

The study's findings underscore the importance of preventing recurrent RVT, highlighting the potential of various treatments to reduce the incidence of new episodes. The effectiveness of Pycnogenol in reducing recurrent RVT and controlling edema is particularly significant, providing a promising therapeutic option for individuals with a history of this condition. This research encourages proactive management of RVT, aiming to minimize the risk of vision loss and improve the quality of life for patients.

Navigating the Challenges of RVT Management

This research provides valuable insights into the challenges of managing RVT, highlighting the need for effective prevention strategies to minimize the risk of recurrent episodes. The study's findings emphasize the importance of considering various treatment options, tailoring the approach to the individual needs of each patient. This research encourages further investigation into the mechanisms of action of different treatments, aiming to develop more targeted and effective therapies for preventing recurrent RVT and preserving vision.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is like a camel caravan journeying through a vast and unforgiving desert, seeking ways to prevent the recurrence of RVT. The study's findings offer valuable insights into the potential of different treatments, particularly Pycnogenol, to reduce the risk of new episodes and protect vision. This journey through the desert of ophthalmology underscores the importance of proactive management of RVT, ensuring the well-being of individuals struggling with this condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2019-08-07
  2. Date Revised 2019-08-07
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

30964246

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.23736/S0026-4725.19.04891-6

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.