Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Comparing the effectiveness and adverse effects of pilocarpine and cevimeline in patients with hyposalivation.
Author: CimminoJoseph, FaragArwa M, HollidayCraig, PapasAthena, RoomianTamar
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: Pilocarpine (PILO) and cevimeline (CEV) are muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonists that stimulate salivary gland function. The aim of this investigation was to retrospectively run a head-to-head comparison for their effectiveness and frequency of adverse effects in patients with hypo...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.13192
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Comparing the Effectiveness of Pilocarpine and Cevimeline for Hyposalivation
Oh, the woes of a dry mouth! This is a real challenge for many, especially as we age. This research delves into the world of hyposalivation, a condition where your mouth doesn't produce enough saliva. The researchers were particularly interested in the effectiveness of two drugs, pilocarpine and cevimeline, both of which stimulate salivary gland function. They conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with hyposalivation and prescribed one of these drugs. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of these drugs and their potential side effects.
Cevimeline Shows Promise for Salivary Stimulation
The results showed that cevimeline was more effective than pilocarpine in stimulating saliva production, particularly in the short term. However, the researchers noted that this difference in effectiveness wasn't sustained over the long term. Interestingly, the study found that pilocarpine was associated with a higher incidence of side effects compared to cevimeline. Another fascinating finding was that patients were more likely to stick with the cevimeline treatment plan than the pilocarpine one.
Finding the Right Solution for a Dry Mouth
This study provides valuable insights into the treatment of hyposalivation. While both pilocarpine and cevimeline seem to be helpful, cevimeline appears to be a more effective and well-tolerated option for many patients. If you're struggling with a dry mouth, consulting with a doctor is crucial to finding the most suitable treatment for your individual needs. Remember, staying hydrated and maintaining good oral hygiene can also help prevent hyposalivation. Just like a camel in the desert needs to conserve water, we all need to pay attention to our hydration levels!
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
While both pilocarpine and cevimeline are effective in stimulating salivary gland function, cevimeline seems to be the better choice for many patients due to its effectiveness and reduced side effects. This research is a good reminder that choosing the right treatment for a specific condition can be crucial for the long-term well-being of patients.
Date :
- Date Completed 2019-12-31
- Date Revised 2019-12-31
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.