Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: It is critically important to study the real-world data of FDA-approved medications to understand the response rates and toxicities observed in the real-world population not represented in the clinical trials. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients diagnosed with metastatic, hormone re...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9631302/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Alpelisib: A Real-World Look at a Promising Cancer Treatment

Oncology is a vast desert of research, constantly searching for new oases of hope for patients battling cancer. This study delves into the real-world effectiveness of alpelisib, a medication approved for a specific type of breast cancer. Researchers used a [single institution experience] to evaluate the treatment's efficacy in a setting outside of clinical trials, where the patient population is more diverse and complex.

The study found that alpelisib showed a modest benefit in real-world settings, with an overall response rate of [12.5%] (3/24 patients). However, it also highlighted significant side effects, with [85.19%] of patients discontinuing treatment, many due to adverse events. This highlights the importance of carefully weighing the potential benefits and risks of alpelisib, particularly in the context of later lines of therapy.

Real-World Insights: Understanding Alpelisib's Effectiveness

The study provides valuable insights into alpelisib's real-world application. While the overall response rate was [12.5%], this was primarily attributed to partial responses, meaning that the tumor size decreased but was not completely eradicated. The study also found that [51.9%] of patients required dose adjustments due to side effects, suggesting that individual patients may respond differently to alpelisib and require careful monitoring.

Navigating the Desert of Cancer Treatment: A Balanced Approach

The findings underscore the importance of open and honest communication between doctors and patients when considering alpelisib treatment. While it offers hope for some individuals, its effectiveness can vary, and side effects are a significant concern. Patients should be informed about these factors and carefully consider the potential risks and benefits before making treatment decisions.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Alpelisib is a promising treatment for metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, like a desert oasis, its benefits can be elusive, and side effects can be a harsh reality for some. A collaborative approach between doctors and patients is crucial to navigate this treatment landscape effectively.

Date :
  1. Date Completed n.d.
  2. Date Revised 2022-11-08
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

36338738

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC9631302

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.