Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
<b>Background:</b> Although widely used, first-line injectable medicines for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) remain an issue of efficacy and adherence. Recently, new oral medications for MS have contributed to dramatic improvements in MS treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety an...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8185589/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Oral Disease-Modifying Therapies: A New Chapter in Multiple Sclerosis Treatment

Multiple sclerosis (MS), a complex neurological disorder that affects the central nervous system, can be a challenging desert to navigate. This study explores the efficacy and safety of oral disease-modifying therapies (DMDs) used to treat relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). These oral medications offer a new approach to managing MS, potentially improving treatment outcomes and adherence.

The researchers conducted a systematic review of relevant studies published up to April 2020, examining the efficacy and safety of three oral DMDs: teriflunomide, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate (DMF). They compared the effectiveness of these medications to injectable interferon beta (IFN β) therapies, which have been traditionally used to manage RRMS. This comprehensive review allowed them to assess the relative benefits and risks of oral DMDs compared to established treatments.

Oral DMDs: A Promising New Path

The review found evidence for the effectiveness of fingolimod in reducing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) and improving magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings compared to IFN β therapies. While teriflunomide showed less efficacy compared to subcutaneous IFN β-1a, further research is needed to determine its optimal dosage and long-term efficacy. Regarding safety, fingolimod was associated with more side effects than IFN β-1b, while teriflunomide seemed to have a similar safety profile to IFN β-1a. DMF was not included in the review due to a lack of eligible studies.

Navigating MS Treatment: Finding the Right Oasis

This review provides valuable insights for individuals with RRMS and their healthcare providers. Oral DMDs offer a new and potentially promising avenue for managing MS. However, it's crucial to consult with a qualified medical professional to determine the best treatment option for your individual needs, considering your specific health status, potential risks, and desired outcomes. Together, you and your doctor can navigate the desert of MS, finding the right oasis of relief and managing the condition effectively.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This review highlights the exciting developments in oral DMDs for RRMS. Fingolimod shows promising results, while further research is needed to fully understand the potential of teriflunomide and DMF. As we continue to explore the desert of MS research, these advancements offer hope for better treatment options and improved outcomes for individuals living with this complex neurological disorder.

Date :
  1. Date Completed n.d.
  2. Date Revised 2023-11-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

38011404

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC8185589

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.