A crossover comparative study with two bulk laxatives.

Author: PersB, PersM

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Twenty elderly in-patients suffering from severe constipation were treated once daily for 2 weeks with each of two bulk laxatives. The preparations were allocated randomly as the first and second preparation. Agiolax, the new preparation, contained 15 mg senna glucosides, the old preparation, Lunela...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1177/030006058301100111

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Bulk Laxatives: A Tale of Two Camels

My friends, we venture into the world of digestive health, where the smooth passage of food through our system is crucial for overall well-being. This study, like a seasoned camel caravan navigating a challenging desert, compares the effectiveness of two bulk laxatives, Agiolax and Lunelax comp., in treating severe constipation in elderly in-patients.

The researchers, published in [journal name], enrolled 20 elderly patients suffering from constipation. Each patient was randomly assigned to receive one of the laxatives for two weeks, much like choosing a path through a sprawling desert. The researchers then switched the laxatives, allowing each patient to experience both treatments, ensuring a fair comparison.

The results revealed that both laxatives were effective in relieving constipation. No side effects were reported, suggesting that both options were well-tolerated. The findings, like a refreshing oasis in the desert, provide reassuring information for those struggling with constipation, offering hope for relief and improved digestive comfort.

Finding the Right Laxative

This research provides valuable insights for physicians treating patients with constipation. While both laxatives were effective, the study helps inform the selection of the most suitable option based on individual patient preferences and needs. It's a reminder that as we continue to explore the desert of medical knowledge, we must constantly evaluate new options to provide the best possible care for our patients.

Implications for Digestive Health

This research underscores the importance of addressing constipation, a common and often overlooked issue. It emphasizes the role of healthcare professionals in carefully assessing individual patients and recommending appropriate treatments. It's a journey of understanding, like navigating through a vast and complex desert, but one that leads to improved digestive health and overall well-being.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study, like a well-stocked caravan, provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of two bulk laxatives for treating constipation. The research highlights the importance of personalized treatment approaches and the ongoing quest for safe and effective solutions for digestive health.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1983-05-27
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-30
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

6687578

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1177/030006058301100111

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.