Clinical and immunological response to typhoid vaccination with parenteral or oral vaccines in two groups of 30 recruits.

Author: BiselliR, D'AmelioR, FattorossiA, MatricardiP M, NisiniR

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The clinical and immunological responses to typhoid vaccination with parenteral and oral vaccines in two groups of 30 adult male subjects were studied. Specific anti-Salmonella typhi cell-mediated immunity and total or specific anti-lipopolysaccharide faecal immunoglobulin (Ig) A titres in vaccinate...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-410x(93)90237-r

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Typhoid Vaccination: Comparing Parenteral and Oral Vaccines

The search for effective vaccines to protect against infectious diseases is a constant quest, like exploring a vast desert for a life-giving oasis. This study compared the clinical and immunological responses to two different typhoid vaccines: a parenteral (injection) vaccine and an oral vaccine. The researchers aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of each vaccine in inducing immune responses against Salmonella typhi, the bacterium responsible for typhoid fever.

A Different Approach: The Oral Vaccine

The study found that the oral vaccine was more effective in inducing cellular antibacterial activity and specific anti-lipopolysaccharide fecal IgA, suggesting a stronger immune response. Furthermore, the oral vaccine was well-tolerated, with no reported side effects, while the parenteral vaccine led to side effects in a significant proportion of the participants. The findings suggest that the oral vaccine may offer a more effective and safer alternative to the parenteral vaccine.

Choosing the Right Path to Typhoid Protection

This research provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and safety of typhoid vaccines. The findings suggest that the oral vaccine may be a more effective and safer option, particularly in terms of inducing a stronger immune response. However, it is crucial to consult with a healthcare professional to determine the most appropriate vaccine for your individual needs and to discuss any potential risks or side effects.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study demonstrates that the path to typhoid protection can be paved with different approaches, each with its unique benefits and drawbacks. The oral vaccine appears to offer a more effective and safer option, but individual needs and preferences should be considered. Consult with a healthcare professional to determine the best route for achieving typhoid immunity.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1993-06-09
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-28
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

8488716

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0264-410x(93)90237-r

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.