Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol vs rescue therapy in the prevention of PONV in ambulatory gynecologic surgery.

Author: DolmanJ, FrighettoL, LoewenP S, MarraC A

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic therapy (1.25 mg droperidol or 50 mg dolasetron i.v.) vs no prophylaxis (rescue therapy) for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) from a Canadian hospital perspective. DESIGN: A predictive decision analytic model using...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03013543

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Prophylactic Dolasetron or Droperidol: Navigating the Desert of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), a common and unwelcome companion of surgical procedures, can turn a patient's recovery into a challenging desert journey. This study, conducted from a Canadian hospital perspective, explores the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol versus rescue therapy for preventing PONV in ambulatory gynecologic surgery. The researchers employed a decision analytic model, akin to meticulously mapping out a desert route, to assess the potential cost savings and benefits of different treatment approaches.

A Cost-Effective Oasis

The study's findings indicate that both dolasetron and droperidol, when administered prophylactically, are more cost-effective than rescue therapy for preventing PONV. These medications serve as a potential oasis, offering a cost-effective solution to a common postoperative challenge. The analysis suggests that dolasetron and droperidol can significantly reduce the number of patients experiencing PONV, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. While droperidol emerges as slightly more cost-effective, both agents provide valuable benefits.

Navigating the Desert of Postoperative Nausea

The study's insights offer valuable guidance for healthcare providers seeking to optimize patient care and minimize postoperative discomfort. Prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol can be a valuable tool in the fight against PONV, helping patients navigate the desert of postoperative nausea and vomiting with greater ease and comfort.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

The desert of postoperative nausea and vomiting can be a difficult journey for patients, but this study offers a cost-effective oasis. The findings suggest that prophylactic dolasetron or droperidol can significantly reduce the incidence of PONV, leading to improved patient outcomes and reduced healthcare costs. By understanding the benefits and risks associated with these medications, healthcare providers can effectively navigate the desert of PONV, ensuring a smoother and more comfortable recovery experience for their patients.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1999-08-17
  2. Date Revised 2014-07-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

10391600

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/BF03013543

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.