Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Analysis of trials of surgery vs angioplasty in myocardial revascularization.

Author: PrêtreR, TurinaM I

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.

Overview

Surgery and angioplasty resulted in similar overall and infarct-free survival rates at 5 years for low-risk patients. Residual angina was more prevalent after angioplasty, negatively impacting quality of life. Further research is needed for high-risk patients.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
AIM: comparison of surgery and angioplasty for the treatment of coronary artery disease. METHOD: comparison using randomized trials for low-risk patients and observational studies for high-risk patients. RESULTS: in low-risk patients, a strategy of initial surgery or angioplasty achieved similar r...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10738357

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Desert of Coronary Artery Disease Treatment

[Coronary artery disease (CAD)] is a major health concern, and finding the most effective treatment options is a constant challenge. This study takes a deep dive into the desert of [CAD] treatment, comparing two common approaches: [surgery] and [angioplasty]. It is like comparing two oases in the desert, each offering a different path to restoring heart health. The study found that both [surgery] and [angioplasty] were equally effective in [overall and infarct-free survival] for low-risk patients. However, [angioplasty] had a higher rate of [residual angina], which can impact quality of life.

The Importance of Personalized Care

This study highlights the importance of personalized care when treating [CAD]. The results show that both [surgery] and [angioplasty] can be effective, but the best approach depends on the individual patient's needs and risk factors.

Making the Right Choice for Your Heart Health

The findings of this study offer valuable insights for patients with [CAD]. It underscores the importance of having a thorough discussion with your healthcare provider to understand the risks and benefits of different treatment options.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The desert of [CAD] is a complex landscape, and this study offers valuable guidance for navigating the treatment options. By understanding the strengths and limitations of both [surgery] and [angioplasty], patients can make informed decisions about their heart health.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2000-04-25
  2. Date Revised 2010-11-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

10738357

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

siic.1999.0106

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.