Comparative safety of the different macrolides.

Author: RubinsteinE

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The macrolides are generally well tolerated when used for the treatment of acute infections. Even when given long term for prophylaxis, there are few discontinuations due to side-effects. There are isolated reports of QT(c) prolongation in patients treated with erythromycin and other 14-membered-rin...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00397-1

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing the Safety Profiles of Different Macrolides

This research delves into the safety profiles of different macrolide antibiotics, exploring the potential risks and benefits associated with their use. It's like navigating the vast and often unpredictable desert of antibiotic therapy, seeking the safest and most effective path for treatment. The study focuses on the common use of macrolides for acute infections, but also examines their potential for long-term prophylaxis, highlighting the need to consider both immediate and long-term effects.

Understanding the Potential for Drug Interactions and Side Effects

The researchers point out that while macrolides are generally well-tolerated, there are some concerns regarding QT(c) prolongation, particularly with erythromycin and other 14-membered-ring macrolides. This highlights the need for careful monitoring of heart rhythm during treatment. The study also notes the potential for drug interactions, as 14-membered-ring macrolides are metabolized by P450 isoenzymes, potentially interfering with the metabolism of other drugs. In cases of concurrent therapy, azithromycin may be a safer alternative to erythromycin and clarithromycin, providing a more predictable and less interactive treatment approach.

Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Macrolide Antibiotics

This research provides valuable information for healthcare professionals when choosing macrolide antibiotics. It's like having a trusty guidebook for navigating the complex desert of antibiotic therapy, helping to make informed decisions based on individual patient needs and potential risks. The study emphasizes the importance of weighing the benefits of macrolides against the potential side effects and drug interactions, ultimately selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study reminds us that the desert of antibiotic therapy is filled with potential dangers and unexpected twists. It's crucial to be aware of the nuances of each drug and to make informed choices based on thorough research and careful consideration of individual patient needs. By understanding the safety profiles of different macrolide antibiotics, healthcare professionals can make more informed decisions, ensuring the safe and effective treatment of infections.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2002-04-18
  2. Date Revised 2019-09-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

11574199

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00397-1

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.