Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Randomised pragmatic comparison of UK and US treatment of acute asthma presenting to hospital.
Author: DaynesT J, HarrisonB D W, InnesN J, StockingJ A
Original Abstract of the Article :
Systemic corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2) agonists are accepted first line treatments for acute severe asthma, but there is no consensus on their optimum dosage and frequency of administration. American regimens include higher initial dosages of beta(2) agonists and corticosteroids than UK regime...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax.57.12.1040
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
UK vs. US Treatment of Acute Asthma: A Pragmatic Comparison
Acute asthma attacks can be a frightening experience, with symptoms like wheezing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. The treatment of acute asthma often involves systemic corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2) agonists, but there is some variation in the dosage and frequency of administration between different countries. This research, published in the journal Thorax, compares the treatment approaches for acute asthma in the United Kingdom and the United States using a randomized pragmatic trial. The authors investigated the effectiveness of different medication regimens in managing acute asthma attacks presenting at the hospital.
Navigating the Treatment Landscape for Acute Asthma
This study provides valuable insights into the current treatment strategies for acute asthma, highlighting the differences in approaches between the United Kingdom and the United States. The authors found that American regimens typically involve higher initial dosages of beta(2) agonists and corticosteroids compared to UK regimens. While both approaches have their own merits, this research emphasizes the need for further investigation to determine the optimal treatment strategies for managing acute asthma attacks.
A Call for Evidence-Based and Personalized Approaches
This research underscores the importance of evidence-based and personalized approaches to managing acute asthma. It's like a camel caravan navigating a desert, where the path forward is not always clear. The optimal treatment strategy for acute asthma may vary depending on the individual patient and the severity of their attack. This study serves as a reminder that we must continue to refine our understanding of acute asthma and develop treatment approaches that are tailored to individual needs.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This study highlights the differences in treatment approaches for acute asthma between the UK and the US. It emphasizes the need for further research to determine the most effective and safe treatment strategies. Remember, just as a camel caravan needs to adapt to the changing conditions of the desert, so too must we adjust our approach to acute asthma treatment based on individual needs and evolving evidence.
Date :
- Date Completed 2003-01-17
- Date Revised 2019-05-03
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.