Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Seven-year outcome in the RITA-2 trial: coronary angioplasty versus medical therapy.

Author: , ChamberlainDouglas A, ClaytonTim C, FoxKeith A A, HendersonRobert A, JulianDesmond G, KnightRosemary, PocockStuart J

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.

Overview

An initial strategy of PTCA did not influence the risk of death or MI, but it improved angina and exercise tolerance.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to compare the long-term consequences of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and continued medical treatment. BACKGROUND: The long-term effects of percutaneous coronary intervention need evaluating, especially in comparison with an alternative p...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00951-3

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Crossroads: Coronary Angioplasty vs. Medical Therapy

The field of cardiology is constantly striving to optimize treatment strategies for heart disease. This study compares the long-term outcomes of two common approaches: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and continued medical therapy. The researchers aim to provide evidence-based guidance for choosing the most effective treatment path for patients with coronary artery disease.

Unveiling the Long-Term Impact of Angioplasty

The study finds that while an initial strategy of PTCA improved angina and exercise tolerance, it did not significantly influence the risk of death or myocardial infarction. This finding highlights the importance of considering long-term outcomes when making treatment decisions. The study also reveals that while PTCA can be effective, continued medical therapy remains a viable option for many patients.

Making Informed Choices About Heart Health

This research underscores the need for careful evaluation and personalized treatment plans for patients with coronary artery disease. The authors highlight the importance of considering both immediate symptom relief and long-term risks when choosing between PTCA and medical therapy.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study reminds us that the choice of treatment for coronary artery disease should be tailored to the individual patient. It highlights the importance of considering both short-term symptom relief and long-term risks when making treatment decisions. The findings provide valuable information for healthcare providers and patients alike, allowing for more informed choices about heart health.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2003-10-17
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

14522473

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00951-3

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of angioplasty
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.