Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Gold standard medical therapy for glaucoma: defining the criteria identifying measures for an evidence-based analysis.
Author: AlmAlbert, AraieMakoto, CarassaRoberto G, CioffiGeorge A, FennertyM Brian, GreveErik L, HitchingsRoger A, KaufmanPaul L, KitazawaYoshiaki, KrieglsteinGuenther K, ObstbaumStephen A, PongpunPrin Rojana, SusannaRemo, WaxMartin B, ZimmermanThom J
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, several new medical therapies have become available for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A systematic evidence-based approach for identifying an optimal therapeutic agent is lacking. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this review were to critically evaluat...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clintera.2004.12.007
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Defining the Gold Standard for Glaucoma Treatment: A Quest for Oasis in a Desert of Options
The field of glaucoma treatment is a vast desert, with numerous potential options for managing this eye condition. This study delves into the complexities of identifying a 'gold standard' therapy, addressing a critical need in the field. The authors meticulously reviewed existing literature, evaluating various therapeutic approaches and establishing criteria for an ideal treatment regimen. Their findings emphasize the importance of efficacy, safety, and patient compliance in achieving optimal outcomes. This research serves as a valuable map for navigating the diverse therapeutic landscape, guiding clinicians toward evidence-based choices.
The Importance of Evidence-Based Therapy
The researchers acknowledge the lack of clear standards in glaucoma treatment, highlighting the need for evidence-based criteria to guide clinical decision-making. They propose a set of criteria for evaluating intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering agents, emphasizing the importance of efficacy, safety, and patient adherence. This approach underscores the need for rigorous scientific evaluation to ensure that treatment strategies are based on solid evidence, not just desert mirages.
Navigating the Desert of Glaucoma Treatment Options
The study's findings provide a valuable framework for evaluating current and future glaucoma treatments. The authors' emphasis on evidence-based decision-making, combined with their focus on patient-centered care, will help clinicians navigate the complexities of glaucoma treatment. By carefully considering efficacy, safety, and compliance, clinicians can help patients find a path toward better vision and a brighter future.
Dr. Camel's Conclusion
This research provides a valuable guide for navigating the complexities of glaucoma treatment. The authors' proposed criteria offer a much-needed framework for evaluating therapeutic options, ensuring that clinicians can choose the most effective and safe treatments for their patients. The study's findings highlight the importance of evidence-based decision-making in a field that often relies on intuition and experience. As we continue to journey through the vast desert of glaucoma treatment, this research provides a beacon of hope for finding the most effective solutions for patients.
Date :
- Date Completed 2005-04-28
- Date Revised 2018-12-01
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.