Cost and utilization impacts of oral antihistamines in the California Medi-Cal program.

Author: HayJoel W, LeahyMichael

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Newer oral allergic rhinitis (AR) medications, the second-generation antihistamines (SGAs) have gained widespread acceptance because of their efficacy and reduced side effects relative to first-generation antihistamines (FGAs). There are no empirical studies comparing the costs of treatment of SGAs ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00042.x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Cost and Utilization Impacts of Oral Antihistamines for Allergic Rhinitis

Dr. Camel here, your trusty guide through the desert of allergies. This study looks at the cost-effectiveness of different types of oral antihistamines for treating allergic rhinitis, a condition that can make you feel as uncomfortable as a sandstorm blowing in your face. The study compares the costs of first-generation antihistamines (FGAs) and second-generation antihistamines (SGAs), like comparing the cost of a camel caravan to a more modern hot air balloon.

SGAs: A More Cost-Effective Choice?

The study found that SGAs, despite being newer and more expensive, could be a more cost-effective option for treating allergic rhinitis. It's like choosing a hot air balloon, which might have a higher upfront cost but could potentially save you money in the long run. This is because SGAs often lead to fewer side effects and therefore less need for additional treatments, like a balloon ride that might require less fuel and maintenance than a caravan.

Managing Allergies: Finding the Right Path

Allergic rhinitis can be a nuisance, but understanding your treatment options is crucial. This study suggests that SGAs might be a more cost-effective choice compared to FGAs. It's important to discuss your individual needs and preferences with your healthcare provider to determine the best course of action. Just like a camel chooses the most efficient route across a vast desert, you need to find the most effective and affordable way to manage your allergies.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of considering cost-effectiveness when choosing allergy medications. It encourages healthcare professionals and patients to make informed decisions based on the potential benefits and costs of different treatment options. Just like a camel navigates the desert with a keen eye on resources, we need to be mindful of our healthcare choices to ensure the best possible outcomes.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2005-09-20
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

16091028

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00042.x

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.