A randomized double-blind controlled trial of roxithromycin and cefaclor in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections in general practice.

Author: DoveyS M, TilyardM W

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, single-dummy placebo-controlled study is being undertaken by the Research Unit of the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners to compare the efficacy and tolerance of 150 mg twice daily roxithromycin with 250 mg three times daily cefaclor in the tr...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0732-8893(92)90135-g

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Roxithromycin vs. Cefaclor: A Race Against Respiratory Infections

The battle against acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) is a common challenge, requiring effective and well-tolerated treatments. This study delves into the efficacy and tolerability of two antibiotics: roxithromycin and cefaclor, in treating LRTIs. The researchers conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of these medications in a large cohort of patients with LRTIs.

Roxithromycin: A Potential Advantage in Treating Acute LRTIs

The study suggests that roxithromycin may offer a potential advantage in treating acute LRTIs compared to cefaclor. The researchers found that roxithromycin demonstrated a higher overall efficacy rate, particularly for bacteriologically evaluable cases. Imagine a camel caravan racing through a desert to reach a distant oasis – the caravan with a faster and more reliable mode of transportation has a higher chance of reaching its destination. Similarly, roxithromycin's effectiveness in treating LRTIs could provide a faster path to recovery for patients.

Balancing Efficacy and Tolerability

The study highlights the importance of considering both efficacy and tolerability when selecting antibiotics for LRTIs. While roxithromycin demonstrated a higher efficacy rate, cefaclor was generally well tolerated with fewer side effects. It's like navigating a desert with different terrains – some paths may be smoother and more comfortable, while others may be faster but more challenging. Choosing the right path depends on the specific circumstances and priorities of the traveler.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the efficacy and tolerability of roxithromycin and cefaclor in treating acute LRTIs. It suggests that roxithromycin may offer a potential advantage in terms of efficacy, but cefaclor may be a better option for patients who are particularly sensitive to side effects. It's like navigating a desert with multiple routes – choosing the right path depends on the specific needs and preferences of the traveler.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1992-08-04
  2. Date Revised 2019-12-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

1617932

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0732-8893(92)90135-g

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.