Treatment options and pregnancy outcome in women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

Author: El-RefaieyAbdel-Aziz A, El-TatongyMohamed, FawzyMuhammad, MosbahAlaa, ShokeirTarek, WardaOsama

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of enoxaparin alone with combination therapy of prednisone, aspirin and progesterone in the treatment of women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage (IRM) in terms of live births and pregnancy outcome. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded, placebo-control...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0527-x

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Finding Hope in the Desert of Recurrent Miscarriage

Recurrent miscarriage, the experience of multiple pregnancy losses, can be a heartbreaking and emotionally draining experience. This study explores the efficacy of different treatment options for women with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage (IRM). The researchers conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial to compare the effects of enoxaparin alone with a combination therapy of prednisone, aspirin, and progesterone.

Enoxaparin and Combination Therapy Show Promise

The study found that both enoxaparin alone and the combination therapy resulted in significantly higher live birth rates compared to placebo. While the combination therapy demonstrated a slightly higher live birth rate, the difference was not statistically significant. Both treatment regimens were associated with a good pregnancy outcome.

Navigating the Complexities of Pregnancy Loss

This study provides valuable insight into the treatment options for women experiencing IRM. Understanding the potential benefits and risks of different approaches is crucial for making informed decisions and supporting women through this challenging experience.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study offers a glimmer of hope in the desert of recurrent miscarriage. By exploring different treatment options, researchers provide a path toward better outcomes for women facing this heartbreaking experience. This research underscores the importance of personalized medicine and the need for continued research into more effective interventions for managing IRM.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2008-11-05
  2. Date Revised 2023-08-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

18071727

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s00404-007-0527-x

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.