Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of treatments to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis.

Author: AlexanderAlicia, CarterJason, ChenSusan, DesaiSheetal B, GrossmanJennifer, JohnsenBreanne, MacLeanCatherine, MaglioneMargaret, McMahonMaureen, McNamaraMelissa, MojicaWalter, NewberrySydne, RanganathVeena, SuttorpMarika, TimmerMartha, TringaleCarlo, ValentineDi, ZhouAnnie

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.Research funding provided by the Public Health Service (PHS).
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

Many agents are effective in preventing osteoporotic fractures, but the data are insufficient to determine the relative efficacy or safety of these agents.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Although several agents are available to treat osteoporosis, the relative efficacy and toxicity of these agents when used to prevent fractures has not been well described. PURPOSE: To compare the benefits in fracture reduction and the harms from adverse events of various therapies for o...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00198

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

A Comparative Journey: Exploring Osteoporosis Treatments

Osteoporosis, a condition characterized by weakened bones, is a significant public health concern. This research navigates the diverse landscape of osteoporosis treatments, comparing the effectiveness and safety of various agents in preventing fractures. The researchers conducted a systematic review of existing studies, analyzing the efficacy and potential adverse effects of different medications. The review found that several agents, including alendronate, risedronate, and estrogen, effectively prevent fractures, particularly vertebral and hip fractures. It's like comparing different caravan routes across the desert, evaluating their effectiveness and potential risks to find the safest and most efficient path.

Navigating the Desert of Osteoporosis Treatment

This review provides valuable information for healthcare providers and patients seeking to manage osteoporosis. It offers a comprehensive overview of the available treatment options, highlighting their relative strengths and weaknesses. The review emphasizes the importance of individualized treatment plans, tailored to the patient's specific needs and risk factors.

Choosing the Right Treatment for Osteoporosis

This review highlights the importance of consulting with healthcare providers to determine the most appropriate treatment for osteoporosis. It emphasizes the need to consider individual risk factors, potential benefits, and potential side effects to make informed decisions about treatment options. It's like choosing a caravan route that is best suited for one's specific needs, considering the terrain, weather conditions, and available resources.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This review provides valuable insights into the diverse landscape of osteoporosis treatments, emphasizing the need for a personalized approach to managing this condition. It reminds us that the best treatment option is not always one-size-fits-all, but rather tailored to the individual needs and circumstances of the patient.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2008-02-20
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-31
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

18087050

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.7326/0003-4819-148-3-200802050-00198

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of osteoporosis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.