Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
The objective was to evaluate if variations in serum alkaline DNase activity (SADA) can predict the effects of therapy in women with early stages of primary cervical carcinoma. 29 out of 33 patients had no evidence of disease after therapy. Only 5 out of the 29 women showed increased SADA levels aft...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5379(91)90103-k

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Serum Alkaline DNase Activity: A Limited Role in Monitoring Cervical Cancer Therapy

Cervical cancer is a serious concern, and finding effective treatments is a critical priority. This study, published in [journal name], investigates the potential use of serum alkaline DNase activity (SADA) as a biomarker for monitoring the effectiveness of therapy in women with early-stage cervical carcinoma.

The researchers analyzed SADA levels in 33 patients with early-stage cervical cancer before and after treatment. While the majority of patients (29 out of 33) showed no evidence of disease after therapy, the study found no clear correlation between SADA levels and treatment outcomes.

The authors conclude that SADA levels may not be a reliable indicator of treatment effectiveness in early-stage cervical carcinoma.

The Importance of Multifaceted Monitoring: A Collaborative Approach

The study emphasizes the need for a multifaceted approach to monitoring treatment outcomes in cervical cancer. This research suggests that relying on a single biomarker may not be sufficient, and a combination of methods may be necessary to accurately assess treatment response.

The Power of Research: Unveiling the Desert of Medical Knowledge

The study highlights the vital importance of research in improving our understanding of cancer and its treatment. Even though the findings may not have led to a definitive breakthrough, they provide valuable insights and contribute to the growing body of knowledge in this field.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Like a lone traveler crossing the desert, this research delves into the vast and complex world of cervical cancer treatment. While the study didn't unearth a definitive answer, it's a reminder that the pursuit of knowledge is a continuous journey.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1992-01-09
  2. Date Revised 2019-07-18
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

1835604

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/0277-5379(91)90103-k

Related Literature

Article Analysis
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.