Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Surgery versus non-surgical therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomised parallel-group trial.

Author: ChanLeighton, ComstockBryan A, DeyoRichard A, HeagertyPatrick J, HollingworthWilliam, JarvikJeffrey G, KerriganCarolyn L, KliotMichel, TurnerJudith A

Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.
Research Support, N.I.H., IntramuralFunding provided by the NIH for research projects within the NIH.

Overview

A previous study found surgery to be more effective than splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome. This study compares surgery to a multi-modal approach involving non-surgical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome in patients without nerve damage. The researchers expect that surgery will lead to better function and symptom relief.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
A previous randomised controlled trial reported greater efficacy of surgery than of splinting for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Our aim was to compare surgical versus multi-modality, non-surgical treatment for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome without denervation. We hypothesised that sur...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61517-8

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Surgery vs. Non-Surgical Therapy for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comparative Trial

Carpal tunnel syndrome, a common condition causing pain and numbness in the hand, has been the subject of much research. This study compares the efficacy of surgery versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, aiming to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians. The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the outcomes of both treatment approaches.

A Comparative Oasis: Finding the Best Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

The study found that surgery led to improved functional and symptom outcomes compared to non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. This finding suggests that surgery may be the more effective treatment option for individuals experiencing significant symptoms.

Choosing the Right Path: A Collaborative Decision

This research emphasizes the importance of a collaborative decision-making process between the patient and clinician. It underscores the need for a thorough assessment of individual patient needs and preferences to determine the most appropriate treatment approach. Like choosing the best path through a vast desert, selecting the right treatment option can significantly impact the journey to recovery.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of surgical and non-surgical treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome. The findings highlight the importance of personalized medicine and individualized decision-making, ensuring that patients receive the most effective and appropriate treatment for their specific needs.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2009-10-28
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

19782873

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61517-8

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.