Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Pefloxacin compared with cefotaxime for treating men with uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis.

Author: AnguloA F, HabbemaL, MichelM F, SindhunataI R, StolzE, TioT T, WagenvoortJ H

Clinical TrialA clinical trial is a planned study conducted on humans to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and treatment methods. It aims to explore the possibilities of new treatments and improve the health of patients.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.

Overview

Pefloxacin and cefotaxime were both effective in treating uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis in men, with 100% cure rates. Pefloxacin was associated with a lower incidence of postgonococcal urethritis (9%) compared to cefotaxime (20%).
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a randomized comparative study, 83 male patients suffering from acute uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis were treated with a single dose of either 0.8 g pefloxacin, given orally, or 1.0 g cefotaxime, given intramuscularly. The cure rates were 100% in both treatment groups four to seven days and ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/26.suppl_b.141

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Pefloxacin vs. Cefotaxime: A Desert Showdown for Gonococcal Urethritis

Gonococcal urethritis, a sexually transmitted infection, is like a desert traveler facing a sudden and unwelcome obstacle. This research examines the effectiveness of [pefloxacin] compared to [cefotaxime] in treating [uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis] in men. The authors conducted a [randomized comparative study] to assess the efficacy and safety of these antibiotics. Their findings offer valuable insights into the best treatment options for this common infection.

A Desert Duel

The study revealed that both [pefloxacin] and [cefotaxime] demonstrated [high cure rates] in treating [gonococcal urethritis]. It's like a desert showdown, where both warriors prove their ability to defeat the enemy. However, [pefloxacin] showed a lower incidence of [postgonococcal urethritis] compared to [cefotaxime]. This suggests that pefloxacin might be a more effective option for preventing long-term complications.

Protecting the Oasis of Health

This research provides valuable information for healthcare professionals treating [gonococcal urethritis]. It's like choosing the best weapon to protect a precious oasis from infection. The findings suggest that both pefloxacin and cefotaxime are effective options, but pefloxacin may offer a slightly higher chance of preventing long-term complications. It's a reminder that selecting the right antibiotic is crucial for a full and lasting recovery.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research explores the effectiveness of two antibiotics in treating gonococcal urethritis. Like two skilled desert warriors, pefloxacin and cefotaxime both demonstrate their ability to combat this infection. However, pefloxacin's lower incidence of postgonococcal urethritis suggests that it might be a more reliable shield for protecting the oasis of health. It's a reminder that the right antibiotic can be a powerful tool for restoring health and well-being.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1991-01-29
  2. Date Revised 2019-05-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2124210

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1093/jac/26.suppl_b.141

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Side Effects of cefotaxime injection
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.