Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Key outcomes are usually not reported in published fracture secondary prevention programs: results of a systematic review.
Author: BeatonDorcas, BogochEarl, Elliot-GibsonVictoria, PosenJosh, SaleJoanna E M
Original Abstract of the Article :
A secondary analysis of a systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis (OP) investigation and treatment was conducted to examine reported key outcomes: (1) the cost of the intervention; (2) the proportion of patients taking OP medication beyond 6 months of the intervention; and (3) the...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1442-y
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Fracture Prevention: A Missing Piece of the Puzzle
Osteoporosis, a condition characterized by weak and brittle bones, is a significant health concern. To address this issue, researchers are constantly exploring interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment. This systematic review takes a step back and examines a crucial but often overlooked aspect of fracture prevention programs: the reporting of key outcomes. The authors investigated the reporting of three key outcomes in published fracture prevention programs: the cost of intervention, the proportion of patients taking osteoporosis medication beyond six months, and the proportion of patients who re-fractured. Their findings highlight a significant gap in the reporting of these crucial outcomes, suggesting a need for improvement in the transparency and completeness of research in this area.
Shining a Light on the Desert of Data
This review exposes a lack of transparency in research on fracture prevention programs. The authors found that key outcomes, such as the cost of interventions and long-term medication adherence, are often not reported, making it challenging to assess the true impact of these programs. This lack of data hinders our understanding of what works best and how to improve outcomes for patients with osteoporosis. It's like wandering in a desert with no map, making it difficult to find your way to an effective solution.
The Need for More Transparent Research
This study underscores the need for more comprehensive and transparent research in fracture prevention. Reporting key outcomes consistently and systematically can significantly improve our understanding of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different interventions. This will ultimately lead to better treatment strategies for patients with osteoporosis and help them navigate the desert of bone fragility.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
This review sheds light on a crucial gap in fracture prevention research, emphasizing the need for greater transparency and completeness in reporting key outcomes. It's time to map out a clearer path in the desert of osteoporosis research so we can reach the oasis of better patient care.
Date :
- Date Completed 2014-10-14
- Date Revised 2019-12-10
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.