[Second neoplasm after treatment of localized prostate cancer].

Author: , AriasE, AstudilloP, ManterolaC

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Prostate cancer (PC) treatment in early stages is radical prostatectomy (RP) or external radiotherapy (ER). There is some uncertainty regarding the development of new ER induced malignant tumors or second primary tumor (SPT), a fact influencing the choice of therapy. The purpose of this study is to ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2011.10.012

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Prostate Cancer Treatment: Navigating the Uncertainties in the Desert of Second Neoplasms

This study delves into the complex world of prostate cancer (PC) treatment, particularly focusing on the potential for developing second neoplasms after treatment. The research examines the incidence and timing of new malignant tumors following radical prostatectomy (RP) or external radiotherapy (ER), aiming to provide valuable insights for guiding treatment decisions.

Second Neoplasms: A Hidden Dune in the Landscape of Prostate Cancer Treatment

This study sheds light on a critical consideration in prostate cancer treatment: the risk of developing second neoplasms. The research suggests that both RP and ER can potentially increase the risk of developing new malignant tumors. However, the study does not provide definitive conclusions regarding the optimal treatment approach, emphasizing the need for further investigation to fully understand this complex issue.

Prostate Cancer Treatment: A Journey Through the Desert of Uncertainties

This study underscores the complexity of prostate cancer treatment, reminding us that the journey through this landscape can be fraught with uncertainties. The research highlights the importance of carefully considering the potential risks and benefits of different treatment options, particularly in relation to the potential for developing second neoplasms. Further research is needed to develop more precise and individualized treatment strategies that minimize these risks.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of careful consideration in prostate cancer treatment, particularly regarding the potential for developing second neoplasms. It emphasizes the need for ongoing research to better understand the risks and benefits of different treatment approaches, guiding us towards more personalized and effective strategies.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-12-02
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-02
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22178343

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/j.acuro.2011.10.012

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

Spanish

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.