Acute effects of a single, oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) administration in healthy volunteers.

Author: AllenP, AtakanZ, BatallaA, BhattacharyyaS, BorgwardtS, CrippaJ A, FarréM, LangohrK, Martin-SantosR, McGuireP K, SealM, ZuardiA W

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
RATIONALE: Animal and humans studies suggest that the two main constituents of cannabis sativa, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have quite different acute effects. However, to date the two compounds have largely been studied separately. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare th...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.2174/138161212802884780

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Delving into the Distinct Effects of THC and CBD: A Double-Blind Trial in Healthy Volunteers

The effects of cannabis sativa are a complex and fascinating topic, with its two main constituents, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), having very different impacts. This double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial aimed to investigate and compare the acute effects of both THC and CBD in the same group of healthy male volunteers. The study used a randomized approach, administering oral THC (10 mg), CBD (600 mg), or placebo in three consecutive sessions, separated by one month. The authors found that THC, in contrast to both CBD and placebo, led to anxiety, dysphoria, positive psychotic symptoms, physical and mental sedation, subjective intoxication, and an increased heart rate. Interestingly, CBD showed no significant differences compared to placebo in any of the measured variables. This research sheds light on the distinct pharmacological profiles of THC and CBD, providing a clearer understanding of their individual effects.

Navigating the Shifting Sands of Cannabis Research

These results are like finding a hidden oasis in the vast desert of cannabis research. THC, with its potent effects, stands out like a towering sand dune, while CBD, with its gentle touch, resembles a tranquil valley. This study provides a valuable roadmap for navigating the complex landscape of cannabis research, emphasizing the importance of carefully considering the distinct effects of each constituent.

A Journey Through the Cannabis Desert: Understanding the Risks and Benefits

As we journey through the desert of cannabis use, it's crucial to understand the potential risks and benefits of each constituent. THC, with its potent psychoactive effects, can be a double-edged sword, offering relaxation and euphoria but also carrying the risk of anxiety, psychosis, and impaired cognitive function. CBD, on the other hand, seems to be a more gentle companion, offering therapeutic potential without the psychoactive effects. This research reinforces the need for responsible and informed use of cannabis products, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches and understanding the potential effects of each constituent.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study is a welcome addition to the growing body of research exploring the therapeutic potential of cannabis. The findings highlight the distinct pharmacological profiles of THC and CBD, paving the way for more targeted and effective approaches to cannabis use. Remember, just as a camel adapts to the desert environment, we must adapt our understanding and use of cannabis to navigate the shifting sands of its complexity.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-03-25
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22716148

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.2174/138161212802884780

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.