Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

A randomized controlled trial of psychoeducation or cognitive-behavioral therapy in bipolar disorder: a Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety treatments (CANMAT) study [CME].

Author: ArenovichTamara, BeaulieuSerge, CervantesPablo, KennedySidney H, LevittAnthony, MacqueenGlenda M, ParikhSagar V, Patelis-SiotisIrene, StreinerDavid L, VelyvisVytas, YathamLakshmi N, YoungL Trevor, ZaretskyAri

Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

While medication is often used for bipolar disorder, additional therapies are often needed. This study compares two types of therapy: a short group therapy session focused on education and a longer, individual therapy program based on cognitive-behavioral therapy. The study aims to determine which type of therapy is more effective in managing mood symptoms over time.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Bipolar disorder is insufficiently controlled by medication, so several adjunctive psychosocial interventions have been tested. Few studies have compared these psychosocial treatments, all of which are lengthy, expensive, and difficult to disseminate. We compared the relative effectiveness of a brie...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.11m07343

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Comparing Treatments: Psychoeducation vs. Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Bipolar Disorder

Managing [bipolar disorder] effectively often requires more than just medication. This study delves into the realm of [psychosocial interventions], comparing the relative effectiveness of two distinct approaches: brief psychoeducation groups and individual cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The authors conducted a [randomized controlled trial] to investigate the long-term impact of these interventions on mood burden in individuals with bipolar disorder.

Tailoring Treatment to Individual Needs

This study emphasizes the importance of [choosing the right psychosocial intervention for individuals with bipolar disorder]. The authors found that [while both interventions showed positive outcomes, CBT demonstrated a greater reduction in mood burden over time]. These findings suggest that [the choice of intervention should be tailored to individual needs and preferences].

Supporting Mental Health: A Multifaceted Approach

This research highlights the crucial role of [psychosocial interventions in managing bipolar disorder]. It emphasizes the need for [a multifaceted approach that includes both medication and psychosocial support] to achieve optimal outcomes. By understanding the different treatment options available, individuals with bipolar disorder can [make informed decisions about their care and seek personalized support].

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

Bipolar disorder can be a challenging journey, much like a camel traversing a shifting desert landscape. This research offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of different psychosocial interventions, empowering individuals with bipolar disorder to choose the best approach for their unique needs. It encourages a collaborative approach to treatment, emphasizing the importance of both medication and psychosocial support.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2012-09-26
  2. Date Revised 2018-12-01
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

22795205

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.4088/JCP.11m07343

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of bipolar disorder
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.