Salvage radical prostatectomy as management of locally recurrent prostate cancer: outcomes and complications.

Author: PrasadSandip M, RosoffJames S, SavageStephen J

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: Management of prostate cancer following radiation therapy remains challenging, especially for younger men or those with life expectancy greater than 10 years. We outline the efficacy, safety and adequacy of radical prostatectomy for the treatment of radiorecurrent localized prostate cancer....See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-013-1029-z

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Salvage Radical Prostatectomy: A Second Chance for Men with Prostate Cancer

Prostate cancer, a common malignancy affecting men, can sometimes recur after radiation therapy. This systematic review explores the efficacy, safety, and appropriateness of salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP), a surgical procedure to remove the prostate gland, as a treatment option for locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy. The authors analyzed relevant published data from 1980 to 2012 to evaluate the outcomes and complications of SRP in this context.

SRP: A Curative Option for Selected Patients

The review found that SRP can be a potentially curative option for carefully selected patients with radiorecurrent localized prostate cancer. While SRP is associated with significant morbidity, including urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, it offers a chance for long-term disease-free survival. The authors emphasize the importance of careful patient selection and referral to experienced surgeons to maximize the benefits and minimize the risks of SRP.

Navigating the Risks and Benefits of SRP

This review highlights the complexities involved in managing prostate cancer after radiation therapy. SRP emerges as a potentially curative option, but it carries significant risks and requires careful consideration of individual patient factors. The authors emphasize the importance of individualized decision-making and a multidisciplinary approach to optimizing patient outcomes.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

Prostate cancer, like a desert sandstorm, can be unpredictable and challenging. SRP, like a skilled navigator, can guide patients through this challenging terrain, offering a path to recovery. However, the journey is not without its risks and requires careful planning. This review provides valuable insights into the potential benefits and challenges of SRP, empowering both patients and healthcare professionals to make informed decisions about this treatment option.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2014-09-30
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-10
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23358790

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1007/s00345-013-1029-z

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.