Paper Details
- Home
- Paper Details
Comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus infection in adults: a systematic review.
Author: ChouRoger, CottrellErika Barth, FuRongwei, HartungDaniel, RahmanBasmah, WassonNgoc
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: Multiple treatments are available for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. PURPOSE: To compare benefits and harms of antiviral regimens for chronic HCV infection in treatment-naive adults. DATA SOURCES: English-language literature from MEDLINE (1947 to August 2012), the Cochrane ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について
ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。
* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。
引用元:
https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-2-201301150-00576
データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)
Comparing Treatments for Hepatitis C
Hepatitis C, a viral infection that can cause serious liver damage, has been a major health concern for many years. This study takes a deep dive into the world of antiviral treatments for Hepatitis C, examining the effectiveness and safety of different treatment regimens. The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review, meticulously evaluating numerous studies to compare the benefits and risks associated with various antiviral treatments.
The study found that the newer triple therapy regimens, which combine pegylated interferon, ribavirin, and a protease inhibitor like boceprevir or telaprevir, significantly increased the likelihood of achieving sustained virologic response (SVR), meaning the virus was suppressed to undetectable levels. While these triple therapy regimens proved more effective, they were also associated with an increased risk of certain adverse events, such as hematologic problems and rash. For genotypes 2 and 3 of the virus, shorter treatment durations (12-16 weeks) were found to be less effective than longer durations (24 weeks). Importantly, a sustained virological response (SVR) after antiviral therapy was associated with a lower risk of death from any cause, highlighting the significance of achieving viral suppression.
Understanding the Implications for Treatment
The findings of this study demonstrate that triple therapy regimens involving protease inhibitors are currently the most effective treatment for Hepatitis C genotype 1, offering a higher chance of achieving viral suppression. However, patients should be aware of the potential increased risks of adverse events associated with these regimens.
The Importance of Early Intervention and Monitoring
This research emphasizes the importance of early intervention and monitoring of patients with Hepatitis C to ensure optimal treatment outcomes. It's essential to consult with a healthcare professional to determine the most appropriate treatment plan based on individual factors such as genotype, medical history, and potential risks.
Dr.Camel's Conclusion
The race for a cure for Hepatitis C is a long and winding desert trek, but this comprehensive study provides a valuable roadmap, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different treatment options. It's a reminder that the journey towards a cure is filled with complexities, and that careful consideration must be given to individual patient characteristics and potential risks when choosing the best treatment approach.
Date :
- Date Completed 2013-03-11
- Date Revised 2018-12-02
Further Info :
Related Literature
English
This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.