R-CVP versus R-CHOP versus R-FM for the initial treatment of patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma: results of the FOLL05 trial conducted by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.

Author: AngrilliFrancesco, ArcainiLuca, BrugiatelliMaura, CarellaAngelo Michele, Dell'olioMatteo, Di RaimondoFrancesco, DondiAlessandra, FedericoMassimo, FrancoVito, GaidanoGianluca, GalimbertiSara, LuminariStefano, MarcheselliLuigi, MerliFrancesco, PulsoniAlessandro, RigacciLuigi, SacchiStefano, StelitanoCaterina, TucciAlessandra, VitoloUmberto

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
PURPOSE: Although rituximab (R) is commonly used for patients with advanced follicular lymphoma (FL) requiring treatment, the optimal associated chemotherapy regimen has yet to be clarified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an open-label, multicenter, randomized trial among adult patients with pr...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0866

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Follicular Lymphoma: Comparing Treatment Regimens

Follicular lymphoma, a type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, can be effectively treated with rituximab (R) in combination with chemotherapy. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen remains a topic of debate. This multicenter, randomized trial compared the efficacy of R combined with three different chemotherapy regimens: cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP), cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), and fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FM). The primary endpoint of the study was time to treatment failure (TTF). The researchers found that R-CHOP and R-FM were superior to R-CVP in terms of 3-year TTF and progression-free survival (PFS). However, R-CHOP demonstrated a better risk-benefit ratio than R-FM, suggesting that it may be the preferred treatment option for patients with follicular lymphoma.

A Desert of Options: Navigating the Complexities of Lymphoma Treatment

Imagine a traveler facing a fork in the road, unsure which path to take. Similarly, oncologists treating patients with follicular lymphoma must navigate a complex landscape of treatment options, carefully weighing the potential benefits and risks of each approach. This study provides valuable insights into the comparative efficacy and safety of different chemotherapy regimens, guiding clinicians towards the most effective and appropriate treatment for their patients.

Finding the Right Path: Choosing the Best Treatment for Follicular Lymphoma

This research highlights the importance of carefully selecting the optimal treatment strategy for patients with follicular lymphoma. While the study demonstrates the effectiveness of R-CHOP and R-FM in achieving longer TTF and PFS, it also emphasizes the need to consider the potential for side effects and the overall risk-benefit profile of each regimen. Personalized care, considering the individual characteristics of each patient, is crucial for maximizing treatment effectiveness and minimizing potential complications.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the comparative efficacy of different treatment regimens for follicular lymphoma. While R-CHOP and R-FM demonstrate promising results in terms of TTF and PFS, R-CHOP appears to offer a better risk-benefit ratio. The study underscores the importance of carefully selecting the most appropriate treatment strategy for each patient, balancing efficacy with safety and individual needs.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2013-06-20
  2. Date Revised 2015-11-19
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

23530110

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1200/JCO.2012.45.0866

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.