Oral cephalosporins in perspective.

Author: SmithG H

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
Oral cephalosporins, after 25 years of use, continue to present the clinician with a therapeutic challenge. The older agents have been extensively prescribed for ambulatory adult and pediatric patients with a wide variety of infections caused by gram-positive and some gram-negative organisms. The ne...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://doi.org/10.1177/106002809002400111

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Oral Cephalosporins: A Complex Landscape of Treatment

The world of antibiotics is a complex one, and this study explores the use of oral cephalosporins, a common class of antibiotics. The researchers review the history and efficacy of these drugs, discussing their effectiveness against various bacterial infections and their role in the treatment of different conditions.

Choosing the Right Path: Oral Cephalosporins in Perspective

The study concludes that oral cephalosporins, particularly the newer and more expensive agents, should be reserved for second- or third-line therapy, meaning they should be used only if other antibiotics have failed or caused side effects. This is because other antibiotics like amoxicillin, penicillin V, or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole are generally considered more effective and less expensive for treating common infections. This recommendation is based on the analysis of various clinical trials and published reports.

Navigating the Desert of Infection

This study provides valuable guidance for clinicians navigating the often-challenging landscape of antibiotic therapy. It's like exploring a vast desert; understanding the different types of antibiotics and their effectiveness is crucial for choosing the right path for each patient. By carefully considering the available options and reserving the use of cephalosporins for specific situations, we can ensure the most effective and cost-effective treatment for patients with bacterial infections.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This study highlights the importance of choosing the right antibiotic for each patient. It's like a camel caravan; each camel carries its own unique weight and needs a specific path through the desert. By understanding the effectiveness of different antibiotics and their appropriate uses, we can ensure the best possible outcomes for patients with bacterial infections.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1990-03-13
  2. Date Revised 2019-10-29
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2405586

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1177/106002809002400111

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.