Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Are cognitive interventions for multiple sclerosis effective and feasible?

Author: AlvesJorge, ChiaravallotiNancy, GonçalvesÓscar F, MagalhãesRosana, PetrosyanAgavni, SampaioAdriana, ThomasRoger E

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.
Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.

Overview

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of cognitive interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a condition that affects the brain and often causes cognitive problems. The study reviewed existing research on this topic to determine if there is clear evidence for the benefits of cognitive interventions. The abstract does not provide specific results, only the research question. Therefore, we cannot provide a summary of the study's findings.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Fifty percent of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are estimated to have cognitive impairments leading to considerable decline in productivity and quality of life. Cognitive intervention has been considered to complement pharmacological treatments. However, a lack of agreement concerning the eff...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.3233/RNN-140388

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Cognitive Interventions for Multiple Sclerosis: A Review of Efficacy and Feasibility

This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the effectiveness and feasibility of cognitive interventions for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic neurological disease that can affect cognitive function. The study analyzed data from various studies investigating the impact of cognitive interventions on cognitive performance in MS patients. The results indicated that cognitive interventions can be effective in improving cognitive function in individuals with MS. However, the review also highlighted the need for further research to determine the optimal types of cognitive interventions, their long-term effects, and their feasibility for widespread implementation.

Bridging the Cognitive Gap: The Promise of Interventions

This review underscores the potential of cognitive interventions for improving the cognitive function of MS patients. It provides valuable evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions, while also acknowledging the need for further research to refine their application and optimize their impact.

Empowering Individuals with MS: A Multi-faceted Approach

Managing MS involves a multi-faceted approach that includes medication, lifestyle changes, and cognitive interventions. This review highlights the importance of supporting the cognitive well-being of individuals with MS, empowering them to manage their condition and live fulfilling lives.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This review offers valuable insights into the potential of cognitive interventions to improve the lives of individuals with MS. Just as a camel can adapt to the challenges of the desert by utilizing its cognitive abilities to find resources and navigate the landscape, individuals with MS can benefit from interventions that enhance their cognitive function.
Date :
  1. Date Completed 2015-07-15
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-11
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

25096974

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.3233/RNN-140388

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.