Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparison of Polyethylene Glycol-Electrolyte Solution vs Polyethylene Glycol-3350 for the Treatment of Fecal Impaction in Pediatric Patients.

Author: BolesErin E, GainesCameryn L, TillmanEmma M

Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.

Overview

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution vs polyethylene glycol-3350 for the treatment of fecal impaction in pediatric patients. The study found that both treatments were effective, but PEG-3350 was associated with fewer side effects.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution vs polyethylene glycol-3350 for the treatment of fecal impaction in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective, observational, institutional review board-approved study was ...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4471715/

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Treating Fecal Impaction in Children: PEG-3350 Takes the Lead

The field of [pediatrics] constantly seeks safe and effective treatments for common childhood ailments like fecal impaction and constipation. This study compares the effectiveness and safety of two commonly used polyethylene glycol-based solutions, PEG-electrolyte solution (PEG-ES) and PEG-3350, in treating fecal impaction in pediatric patients. The authors conducted a retrospective observational study to analyze the outcomes and side effects of these two treatments. Their findings suggest that PEG-3350 is as effective as PEG-ES in resolving fecal impaction while being associated with fewer side effects.

PEG-3350: A Smoother Ride Through Constipation

This research suggests that PEG-3350 may be a preferable treatment option for fecal impaction in children compared to PEG-ES. The study found no significant difference in effectiveness between the two treatments, but PEG-3350 was associated with significantly fewer side effects. This finding is significant, as it indicates that PEG-3350 may offer a more comfortable and tolerable treatment option for children with fecal impaction.

Keeping Our Little Ones Regular

This research provides valuable insights into the treatment of fecal impaction in children. It encourages us to consider PEG-3350 as a potentially safer and more tolerable alternative to PEG-ES. Remember, promoting good bowel health and preventing constipation is crucial for our children's overall well-being.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is like finding a cool, refreshing spring in the midst of a desert of constipation struggles. PEG-3350 emerges as a potential oasis, offering a smoother and more comfortable journey towards relief for children suffering from fecal impaction. It's a reminder that even in the seemingly mundane aspects of healthcare, careful research and analysis can lead to significant improvements in our well-being.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2015-07-14
  2. Date Revised 2022-03-11
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

26170773

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC4471715

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.