Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line antiretroviral therapy for the treatment of HIV infection: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Author: BansbackNick, DohertyMeg, FordNathan, ForrestJamie I, KantersSteve, MillsEdward J, NsanzimanaSabin, PopoffEvan, SociasMaria Eugenia, ThorlundKristian, VitoriaMarco

Systematic ReviewA review that systematically collects, evaluates, and integrates relevant research to answer a specific research question.
Comparative StudyResearch that compares multiple groups/interventions to determine differences/similarities in outcomes/characteristics.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Meta-AnalysisA statistical technique that integrates the results of multiple studies to draw more general conclusions about a particular issue.
ReviewAn article that critically examines existing research on a particular topic and summarizes the current state of knowledge in the field.

Overview

Newer drug classes of antiretrovirals were found to be more effective and safer than older treatments for HIV.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
BACKGROUND: New antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for HIV could improve clinical outcomes for patients. To inform global guidelines, we aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of recommended ART regimens for HIV in ART-naive patients. METHODS: For this systematic review and network meta-a...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30091-1

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Navigating the Antiretroviral Landscape: A Comparative Analysis of HIV Treatment Regimens

The development of effective antiretroviral therapies (ART) has revolutionized HIV treatment and management. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of different recommended ART regimens for HIV-infected individuals. The authors analyzed data from 71 randomized clinical trials, including over 34,000 patients, comparing various ART regimens based on their efficacy and safety. The study found that newer ART regimens, particularly those incorporating integrase strand transfer inhibitors, demonstrated superior efficacy in viral suppression and reduced rates of adverse events compared to older regimens.

New Antiretroviral Regimens: A Step Forward in HIV Treatment

This comprehensive analysis highlights the significant progress made in HIV treatment. Newer ART regimens, particularly those incorporating integrase strand transfer inhibitors, have demonstrated improved efficacy and safety compared to older treatments. These findings are a testament to the ongoing research and development efforts in the field of HIV treatment and management.

A Brighter Future for HIV Treatment

This research offers a glimpse into a future where HIV treatment is more effective, safer, and better tolerated. The development of new and improved ART regimens represents a significant advancement in the fight against HIV, offering hope and a brighter future for individuals living with this condition. It's like finding a source of clean water in the vast desert of HIV treatment, providing much-needed relief and a path towards a healthier future.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This research is a testament to the relentless pursuit of better treatments for HIV. The findings highlight the remarkable progress made in developing more effective and safer antiretroviral therapies. It's like finding a hidden oasis of effective treatments in the desert of HIV, offering hope and a better future for individuals living with this condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2017-06-12
  2. Date Revised 2022-04-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

27658869

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30091-1

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.