Paper Details

  1. Home
  2. Paper Details

Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis.

Author: AbdElmagiedAhmed M, BarnardEmily P, BorahBijan J, GornyKrzysztof R, HesleyGina K, JacobyVanessa L, KohiMaureen P, Laughlin-TommasoShannon K, LeppertPhyllis C, MillerMichael J, NievesAngel, PetersonLisa G, PriceThomas M, StewartElizabeth A, VaughanLisa E, WeaverAmy L, WoodrumDavid A

Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch funding provided by the NIH to external research institutions and researchers.
Journal ArticleAn article published in an academic or professional journal that reports original research or scholarly analysis.
Multicenter StudyResearch conducted in collaboration with multiple research institutions. It aims to collect a wide range of data and obtain more generalizable results.
Randomized Controlled TrialA clinical trial that randomly assigns participants to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effects of an intervention.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch funding provided by government agencies outside the United States.

Overview

Uterine fibroids are a common problem for women of childbearing age, but there isn't enough research to clearly guide treatment choices. This study is the first randomized controlled trial to compare two minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids: uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery.
Paper Details　
Original Abstract of the Article :
Uterine fibroids are a common problem for reproductive-aged women, yet little comparative effectiveness research is available to guide treatment choice. Uterine artery embolization and magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery are minimally invasive therapies approved by the US Fo...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元：
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28063909

データ提供：米国国立医学図書館（NLM）

Fibroid Embolization vs. Focused Ultrasound: Choosing the Right Treatment

Uterine fibroids are a common condition that can significantly impact a woman's quality of life. This study compares two minimally invasive treatments for fibroids: uterine artery embolization (UAE) and magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS). The researchers aim to provide valuable data to help women and their doctors make informed treatment decisions. It's like navigating a desert of treatment options, seeking the most effective path to relief.

Comparing Treatment Options for Fibroids

The study, known as the Fibroid Interventions: Reducing Symptoms Today and Tomorrow study, is the first randomized controlled trial to compare UAE and MRgFUS. The results of this comprehensive analysis could provide essential insights into the effectiveness and safety of each treatment. It's like conducting a thorough exploration of two potential oases, seeking the one that offers the most sustainable relief.

Fibroids: A Common Concern

Uterine fibroids are a significant health concern for many women, affecting their reproductive health and overall well-being. This research aims to provide a clearer understanding of the benefits and drawbacks of two minimally invasive treatments. The findings could empower women to make informed decisions about their treatment, leading to improved quality of life. It's like providing a roadmap through the desert of treatment options, helping women find a path that leads to greater comfort and well-being.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

This study provides valuable comparative data on two minimally invasive treatments for uterine fibroids: UAE and MRgFUS. The findings could empower women and their doctors to make informed treatment decisions based on individual needs and preferences. It's a step towards ensuring that women receive the best possible care for this common condition.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2017-07-31
  2. Date Revised 2018-11-13
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

28063909

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

NIHMS840788

Related Literature

Article Analysis
・Effective treatment of uterine fibroids
SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.