Adverse events of raltegravir and dolutegravir.

Author: , BattegayManuel, BernasconiEnos, CalmyAlexandra, CavassiniMatthias, ElziLuigia, ErbStefan, FurrerHansjakob, GünthardHuldrych, VernazzaPietro

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency and risk factors of toxicity-related treatment discontinuations between raltegravir and dolutegravir. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: All antiretroviral therapy (ART)-naïve and ART-experienced HIV-infected individuals from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study w...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5566167/

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Comparing the Adverse Events of Raltegravir and Dolutegravir

This research takes us into the world of virology, specifically examining the adverse events associated with two antiretroviral drugs, raltegravir and dolutegravir, used in the treatment of HIV infection. This research utilizes a prospective cohort study to compare the frequency and risk factors for treatment discontinuations due to toxicity between these two medications.

The study analyzed data from the Swiss HIV Cohort Study, focusing on 4041 patients initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) containing either raltegravir or dolutegravir. The study found that while both drugs demonstrated high virologic efficacy, drug toxicity was infrequent. The most common reason for treatment discontinuation was convenience, such as patient preference or simplification of treatment. However, the study identified neuropsychiatric complaints as the most frequent adverse events, with a higher incidence in the dolutegravir group compared to the raltegravir group. The study also found that female sex was an independent risk factor for treatment discontinuation due to toxicity.

The research suggests that while both raltegravir and dolutegravir are effective in treating HIV infection, they may have distinct toxicity profiles. The findings highlight the importance of monitoring for neurotoxic side effects, particularly in patients taking dolutegravir. This study provides valuable insights for clinicians managing patients with HIV infection, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment approaches and careful monitoring for potential adverse events.

The Importance of Personalized Treatment and Careful Monitoring in HIV Management

This study underscores the importance of personalized treatment and careful monitoring in HIV management. The findings highlight the need for clinicians to consider individual patient characteristics, including sex and potential risk factors for toxicity, when selecting antiretroviral medications. The study also emphasizes the importance of regular monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly neuropsychiatric symptoms, particularly in patients taking dolutegravir.

The Ongoing Need for Research in HIV Treatment

This research highlights the ongoing need for research in HIV treatment. The study provides valuable insights into the toxicity profiles of different antiretroviral medications, highlighting the importance of ongoing research to develop new and safer treatment options for patients with HIV infection. It also emphasizes the need for continuous monitoring and evaluation of existing medications to optimize patient care and minimize potential adverse effects.

Dr. Camel's Conclusion

This research is like a desert guide, offering valuable insights into the complex world of HIV treatment. The authors, like skilled navigators, explore the distinct characteristics of raltegravir and dolutegravir, highlighting their effectiveness while also recognizing the potential for toxicity. It underscores the importance of personalized treatment approaches and careful monitoring, reminding us that the journey towards optimal HIV care is a continuous one that requires ongoing research and vigilance.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 2018-03-26
  2. Date Revised 2020-12-09
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

28692533

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

PMC5566167

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.