Tolerability and antiarrhythmic efficacy of disopyramide compared to lignocaine in selected patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Author: AbrahamsenA M, GundersenT, RønnevikP K

Paper Details 
Original Abstract of the Article :
In a randomized open study with intravenous lignocaine and disopyramide in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and ventricular premature contractions the occurrence of cardiac events, adverse reactions, withdrawals and arrhythmias were compared. Of the total 68 patients included in t...See full text at original site
Dr.Camel IconDr.Camel's Paper Summary Blogラクダ博士について

ラクダ博士は、Health Journal が論文の内容を分かりやすく解説するために作成した架空のキャラクターです。
難解な医学論文を、専門知識のない方にも理解しやすいように、噛み砕いて説明することを目指しています。

* ラクダ博士による解説は、あくまで論文の要点をまとめたものであり、原論文の完全な代替となるものではありません。詳細な内容については、必ず原論文をご参照ください。
* ラクダ博士は架空のキャラクターであり、実際の医学研究者や医療従事者とは一切関係がありません。
* 解説の内容は Health Journal が独自に解釈・作成したものであり、原論文の著者または出版社の見解を反映するものではありません。


引用元:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2880718

データ提供:米国国立医学図書館(NLM)

Disopyramide vs. Lignocaine for Arrhythmias After Heart Attack: Which Oasis is Best?

Imagine your heart as a well-oiled camel navigating the shifting sands of a desert. When a heart attack occurs, it's like a sudden sandstorm disrupting the camel's journey. Arrhythmias, irregular heartbeats, can further complicate the situation, like sandstorms of electrical signals. The researchers in this study wanted to see if two different medications, disopyramide and lignocaine, could help restore a normal heart rhythm after a suspected heart attack.

The study compared the effectiveness of disopyramide and lignocaine in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction and ventricular premature contractions. The results showed that both medications were effective in controlling arrhythmias. However, disopyramide was more effective in completely eliminating premature ventricular contractions. It's like finding two different types of oases in the desert: Both offer relief, but one might be more effective in quenching your thirst than the other.

A Double-Edged Oasis: Effectiveness and Side Effects

While both disopyramide and lignocaine were effective in treating arrhythmias, both medications also had side effects. This is like finding an oasis with refreshing water, but also discovering a few prickly cacti growing nearby. Ultimately, the best treatment option will depend on the individual patient and their specific needs and preferences.

Heart Health in the Desert: Managing Your Heart

If you're experiencing arrhythmias, especially after a heart attack, it's crucial to consult with your doctor. They can help you determine the best treatment plan to manage your condition and maintain a healthy heart. Remember, a healthy heart is like a strong camel that can navigate any desert terrain.

Dr.Camel's Conclusion

The choice between disopyramide and lignocaine for arrhythmias after a heart attack is a complex one. This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness and side effects of these medications. As always, it's essential to work with your doctor to develop a personalized treatment plan that best meets your individual needs.

Date :
  1. Date Completed 1987-04-13
  2. Date Revised 2013-11-21
Further Info :

Pubmed ID

2880718

DOI: Digital Object Identifier

2880718

Related Literature

SNS
PICO Info
in preparation
Languages

English

Positive IndicatorAn AI analysis index that serves as a benchmark for how positive the results of the study are. Note that it is a benchmark and requires careful interpretation and consideration of different perspectives.

This site uses cookies. Visit our privacy policy page or click the link in any footer for more information and to change your preferences.